Article View: uk.education.maths
Article #73Re: Pi day
From: Chris Dearlove
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00
27 lines
2501 bytes
2501 bytes
Greffindel (ipsifend@eagle.cc.ukans.edu) wrote: : (Feel free to shoot me down if I've got a detail slightly bobbled, but...) : I read once (and subsequently verified) that with 3.1415927 as an : approximation for pi, you can compute the circumference of the earth : (or rather, a perfect sphere having the same diameter as the earth) : and be off by only 6 or 7 inches... So it really begs the question-- : when, if ever, are we likely to need more than 10 digits of pi? There's more to pi than circles, and numerical calculations which use pi in other contexts may need more accuracy. A colleague described to me once a problem he once found (in someone else's code, and not while he worked here) where pi had been accidentally coded to too few places. (In some Fortran - all the places were there, the "D0" after the "3.1415926535..." was missing). This caused a noticeable ripple (maybe 140 dB down) when numerically simulating a signal of some sort. This was sufficiently large to matter. Of course here just a few more digits would have been enough, maybe 10 would have done. (I have seen cases where a few more than that are a good idea in general precision requirements.) -- Christopher M. Dearlove, | chris.dearlove@gecm.com GEC-Marconi Research Centre, | Tel: 01245 242194 Int: +44 1245 242194 Gt. Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK | Fax: 01245 242124 Int: +44 1245 242124
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<5hrap4$ec9$1@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> <5gmqsn$bs8@milo.vcn.bc.ca> <AF5DA45C96685884D@sofluc.demon.co.uk> <ant262248d076Quo@cartmell.demon.co.uk> <5heh6s$ooa@raven.cc.ukans.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f458d,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf458d,public X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public X-Google-Thread: f7972,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gidf7972,public X-Google-Thread: 1130d6,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1130d6,public X-Google-Thread: 1077c2,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid1077c2,public X-Google-Thread: 10d67e,30fff994c7ddd7d9 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d67e,public From: cmd@gmrc.gecm.com (Chris Dearlove) Subject: Re: Pi day Date: 1997/04/01 Message-ID: <5hrap4$ec9$1@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com> X-Deja-AN: 230446719 References: <8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> <5gmqsn$bs8@milo.vcn.bc.ca> <AF5DA45C96685884D@sofluc.demon.co.uk> <ant262248d076Quo@cartmell.demon.co.uk> <5heh6s$ooa@raven.cc.ukans.edu> Organization: GEC-Marconi Research Centre Reply-To: chris.dearlove@gecm.com Newsgroups: uk.education.maths,alt.uu.math.misc,aus.mathematics,can.schoolnet.math.sr,alt.math.recreational,sci.math