🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.education.maths
Article #73

Re: Pi day

#73
From: Chris Dearlove
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 00:00
27 lines
2501 bytes
Greffindel (ipsifend@eagle.cc.ukans.edu) wrote:
: (Feel free to shoot me down if I've got a detail slightly bobbled, but...)
: I read once (and subsequently verified) that with 3.1415927 as an
: approximation for pi, you can compute the circumference of the earth
: (or rather, a perfect sphere having the same diameter as the earth)
: and be off by only 6 or 7 inches... So it really begs the question--
: when, if ever, are we likely to need more than 10 digits of pi?  

There's more to pi than circles, and numerical calculations which use pi
in other contexts may need more accuracy.

A colleague described to me once a problem he once found (in someone
else's code, and not while he worked here) where pi had been accidentally
coded to too few places. (In some Fortran - all the places were there,
the "D0" after the "3.1415926535..." was missing). This caused a noticeable
ripple (maybe 140 dB down) when numerically simulating a signal of some
sort. This was sufficiently large to matter.

Of course here just a few more digits would have been enough, maybe 10
would have done. (I have seen cases where a few more than that are a
good idea in general precision requirements.)

--
Christopher M. Dearlove,            | chris.dearlove@gecm.com
GEC-Marconi Research Centre,        | Tel: 01245 242194  Int: +44 1245 242194
Gt. Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK | Fax: 01245 242124  Int: +44 1245 242124
Technical Details
Message-ID: <5hrap4$ec9$1@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> <5gmqsn$bs8@milo.vcn.bc.ca> <AF5DA45C96685884D@sofluc.demon.co.uk> <ant262248d076Quo@cartmell.demon.co.uk> <5heh6s$ooa@raven.cc.ukans.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f458d,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf458d,public
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid109d8a,public
X-Google-Thread: f7972,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7972,public
X-Google-Thread: 1130d6,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1130d6,public
X-Google-Thread: 1077c2,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid1077c2,public
X-Google-Thread: 10d67e,30fff994c7ddd7d9
X-Google-Attributes: gid10d67e,public
From: cmd@gmrc.gecm.com (Chris Dearlove)
Subject: Re: Pi day
Date: 1997/04/01
Message-ID: <5hrap4$ec9$1@miranda.gmrc.gecm.com>
X-Deja-AN: 230446719
References: <8WRuzAAXBILzEwKP@ward-hull.demon.co.uk> <5gmqsn$bs8@milo.vcn.bc.ca> <AF5DA45C96685884D@sofluc.demon.co.uk>  <ant262248d076Quo@cartmell.demon.co.uk> <5heh6s$ooa@raven.cc.ukans.edu>
Organization: GEC-Marconi Research Centre
Reply-To: chris.dearlove@gecm.com
Newsgroups: uk.education.maths,alt.uu.math.misc,aus.mathematics,can.schoolnet.math.sr,alt.math.recreational,sci.math