🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:04:53 +0100, Old Codger
<oldcodger@anyoldwhere.net> wrote:

>On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 18:53:36 +0100, Farmer Giles <Giles@nospam.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Old Codger wrote:
>>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 13:31:39 +0100, Malcolm Ogilvie the troll and
>>> bully <Malcolm@indaal.demon.co.uk>  sought to start conflict and
>>> trouble when he wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Three years ago when someone here suggested:
>>>>
>>>> "I read about the development of a contraceptive drug for grey 
>>>> squirrels, I think it was London University, that would reduce grey 
>>>> squirrel numbers and allow reds to persist without killing."
>>>>
>>>> Angus responded with:
>>>> "I could agree with that."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yet a few days ago, the following letter was published in The Scotsman:
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Dangerous road
>>>> With regard to your report "Chemically castrate grey squirrels to save 
>>>> reds, demands MSP" (27 May), the potential for unintended consequences 
>>>> and moral decline with immunocontraception as a form of population 
>>>> control is enormous . Before long, so-called conservationists could 
>>>> begin favouring designer wildlife populations that suit their agenda and 
>>>> wiping out those considered unacceptable by their origin or abundance 
>>>> within a few generations.
>>>> Indeed, in a world beset with an unsustainable human population, how 
>>>> long would it be before someone, somewhere, decided it was appropriate 
>>>> to use the technology to control humans, similar to that advocated by 
>>>> the German medical experimentation programmes of the 1930s?
>>>>
>>>> A world even more controlled than it is at present is a frightening 
>>>> prospect.
>>>>
>>>> ANGUS MacMILLAN
>>>> Meikle Boturich, near Balloch
>>>> Dunbartonshire
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> So why is what Angus thought was good enough for grey squirrels three 
>>>> years ago, and also regarded it as preferable to shooting deer a few 
>>>> years before that, now much too dangerous to consider using on grey 
>>>> squirrels?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You are hardly one to criticize inconsistency.  You have already been
>>> sacked from one employee for being a bully, and warned by others. We
>>> get a few months of peace from you and then like the sneaky little
>>> snake you are it all starts again. Your post is clearly designed to
>>> cause trouble and attack your victims once again.
>>> 
>>> We also remember when you tried to claim your book on grebes was the
>>> first book on grebes. It later transpired that you had copied Konters
>>> book and then tried desperately to cover it up with threats and abuse.
>>> Of course it never worked and the world now knows Dr Malcolm Ogilvie
>>> of The SNH is a liar, cheat, fraud and bully as we can see here.
>>> 
>>> http://tinyurl.com/ytkqgn
>>> 
>>> and
>>> 
>>> http://tinyurl.com/3npxvm
>>
>>
>>Would you care to comment, Malcy? When you decline to respond to such 
>>charges, it is hardly surprising that others are 'given to understand' 
>>certain things.
>
>He huffed, puffed and bluffed for many years. He took *the boy who
>cried wolf* to heights unseen. Now he's washed up on the beach of
>tidal energy which he is so desperate to support due to a backhander.
>Though it's noticed he's not so keen to let SNH know that, who are
>still promoting wind energy.

He never did explain why he visited the young children's forums
pretending to be a young girl either?

Lust or just lust?

Is David G Bell on the register?