🚀 go-pugleaf

"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:43dbd69c$0$26131$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Carole wrote:
>
> > Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud wrote:
> >
> >>Thank you Carole.
> >>I have read thoroughly and feel things are going really bad.
> >>One should not forget though that Great Civilisations of the past as
well
> >
> ...
> >
> > So if you want to talk about volcanic action and why it is so important,
you
> > will need to justify your stand, otherwise I will just take it as more
> > hatemongering towards Australians and I have had enough of listening to
your
> > vengeful rants on this topic.
>
> You should have caught on by now

No, I'm a bit thick. I only use logic to work things out and haven't got the
synthesised thinking that makes a person a genius, able to calculate without
using logic.

Actually Turcaud uses logic too, but only when it suits him, like saying
that little round pebbles are found at Cooma which is way above sea level,
implying that they are the result of a huge tidal wave. But when it comes to
explaining concepts then its synthesised thinking, which nobody can
understand because only a true celtic pioneer can think in a synthesised
manner. Actually there could be something to that synthesised thinking bit
according to something I read about Reich. See

http://thailandesl.chazzsongs.net/nwo_Symbolism.htm
Some have asked why there are no "Beethoven's" or "Blakes" today. The reason
is obviously because we are not, for the most part, involved in cultivating
the kind of holistic mentation that brings the conscious mind into
harmonious dialogue with the other parts of Being. As Wilhelm Reich has
pointed out we are not even experiencing integration of the somatic level
let alone the noetic. The authority structures of the day are doing
everything possible to make sure that the psychic scission is augmented.
Knowledge comes to us, but it is a knowledge gained through narrow
left-brain cognitive abilities, though exclusion, partiality and
fragmentation, and not from seeing the world as it actually is.

So just when you're thinking Turcaud talks shit and he's totally obsessed
with shit stirring, you find something that makes you think again. And you'd
do well to some serious thinking yourself Foster, because I think you jump
to too many unfounded conclusions. Your reactions are knee jerk to say the
least.

So you think I should have caught on to what?
1) Turcaud did get ripped off with the Telfer mine, its on record in WA
parliament and the president of Australian Mining Leasholders Association
has written a book about the matter too, saying that he thinks Turcaud has a
case. So maybe I should have caught on that Turcaud made up the whole
getting ripped off thing.

2) Turcaud claims that modern colleges teach nothing but shit, and produce
idiots unable to tie their own shoelaces without some sort of man on the
ground to do the footwork for them. This matches my thinking and
observations on the way people get a degree and think they're an expert,
when in actual fact all they know is how to parrot back what they've been
taught, and how to not stray outside the lines of acceptable thinking ie
brainwashed.

So, what should I have woken up to, tell me?

Carole
http://www.conspiracee.com
http://www.cellsalts.net



>
>
> >
> > Carole
> > http://www.conspiracee.com
> >
> >
> >
> >