🚀 go-pugleaf

http://www.unmuseum.org/hollow.htm

Carole wrote:

> "Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud" <xyz@atlante.edu> wrote in message
> news:drfgde$4tj$1@apollon.grec.isp.9tel.net...
> 
>>
>>~~ Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>"carole" <hubbca2003@yahoo.com.au> a �crit dans le message de news:
>>1138403867.219383.182710@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud wrote:
>>>
>>>>Good morning Carole,
>>>>
>>
>>snip
>>
>>
>>>However, I'll point out that geology is a pretty dry topic with a
>>>couple of exceptions.
>>>(1) The hollow earth theory, which I see no reason to believe is wrong.
>>>
>>>(2) The "fossil fuel" theory which every school kid has drummed into
>>>them, is incorrect and we have been lied to for a long time about that
>>>one.
>>>
>>
>>You are correct Carole, both theories are false, but for that matter all
>>present alleged Geology theories are false as well.
> 
> 
> I hate to get logical since the highest form of knowledge is the synthetise
> approach, but to push a point, what exactly do you mean by "both these
> theories are false"
> 
> Yes, they are true or "No", they are false?
> 
> What I am saying is the hollow earth theory is true, and the "fossil fuel"
> theory is false.
> 
> You say, "you are correct Carole, both these theories are false", however, I
> am saying that "yes, the hollow earth theory is true" and "no, the fossil
> fuel theory is incorrect". You don't really make yourself clear on these
> points. Maybe I could have worked it out if you gave a bit more information
> on these topics, but you didn't. And instead you went into a rant on the
> "valley of the blind" which I gave qualifications on before in a previous
> post. That is to say, the problem isn't all about people seeing things
> wrong, but is also about how our society is manipulated and a lot of our tax
> dollars go into think tanks to desseminate fake theories to the public.
> 
> It has been said before, by people or persons, that I have a tendency to
> "over work" things. And yes, I'll admit to this flaw, if it can be called a
> flaw. But to my way of thinking it is a virtue. Yes, you heard me right. To
> rethink and rework isn't necessarily a flaw. Shocked! Surprised! Overtaken
> with angst? Perhaps you are at this intimate disclosure.
> However, the world would be a lot better place if people did rethink and
> rework theories that don't, on initial impressions, make sense.
> 
> Savvy?
> 
> Maybe, maybe not. This is the question.
> 
> Carole
> http://www.conspiracee.com
> http://www.cellsalts.net
> 
>