🚀 go-pugleaf

"[TAA]GreyJackal" wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 05 May 1999 23:50:58 GMT, barry@oneillb.freeserve.co.uk (Barry
> O'Neill) wrote:
> 
> >In article <3730C1D3.401D8EC8@ronin.pass.theplanet.co.uk>,
> >paul@ronin.pass.theplanet.co.uk says...
> >>
> >> I have it for two things :
> >>
> >>      1)  It kicks bots automatically
> >>      2)  It does cool logging
> >>
> >> Does some other stuff too, but I'm not that worried about those bits.
> >
> >I am.  It also kicks people who connect through a firewall and show up
> >with zero ping...
> 
> Aye, I can't connect now :-(

Sorry mate.  I'll sort that out.

> FYI, I'm on a small home LAN which uses a gateway/proxy proggy called
> Sygate on the server to allow simultaneous Internet access for the
> whole LAN.  When BW-Admin is set up as it is currently, it denies
> access due to coming in on a "non-standard" port.

Hmmm... not quite NAT is it... :P  Arse.  I was allowing NAT hoping that
masquerade would work too.

> There was a little episode about 2 months ago on another server that
> put this on and then produced a "Hall of Shame" page supposedly outing
> Z-bots but several folks appeared on it (myself included) for this
> proxy reason.  Buggered if I can remember where it was though and
> therefore who could tell you how to sort it, sorry.

Arse.  Guess we'll be going to "strict 0" then.

	Paul
	[LSoG]R-Storm / RoninStorm[DNA]

-- 
  ++ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ++
     Paul Marshall  =B)
     paul@ronin.pass.theplanet.co.uk
     "Because I can't afford to be misread one more time."
  ++ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ++