Article View: uk.net.regulation
Article #16Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ?
From: Clive D. W. Feather
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:15
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:15
35 lines
3333 bytes
3333 bytes
In article <o4xT7.1414$8%.418515@monolith.news.easynet.net>, pisces <pisces48@yahoo.com> writes >> The relevance of demon.service is ? > >The recent voluminous thread on "NTK on NCS on NNTP". Much of which had nothing to do with demon.service. And, even so, that's not justification. >> I would also argue that uk.politics.censorship is not relevant, since >> this is regulation, not censorship, > >Surveillance and intrusions of privacy that chill free-speech are a form of >censorship. Arguably. >> and that is *exactly* why >> uk.net.regulation exists. > >Why is there some imperative to confine discussion to the most tightly >defined single group ? Even if this group *is* the most appropriate group, >why do you think discussion should *only* occur there ? Because it stops the thread forking in fifteen different directions, as this one already seems to be doing. The *polite* approach is to set followups to a single group in your original posting and tell people you've done so. -- Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home: <clive@davros.org> Tel: +44 20 8371 1138 (work) | Web: <http://www.davros.org> Fax: +44 20 8371 4037 (D-fax) | Work: <clive@demon.net> Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<+zlBtis3o4I8EwNn@on-the-train.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!btnet-peer1!btnet-peer0!btnet!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!romana.davros.org!on-the-train.demon.co.uk!cliveReferences:
<ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <7shl1u04alrar0oioclepforvct06orpe9@4ax.com> <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net> <+5jhP3MRtaH8Ew1O@romana.davros.org> <o4xT7.1414$8%.418515@monolith.news.easynet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd4f2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd4f2,public X-Google-Thread: 11543b,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid11543b,public X-Google-Thread: fad9d,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public X-Google-Thread: 104271,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid104271,public X-Google-Thread: f6b0a,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6b0a,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-Thread: 10b38e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b38e,public X-Google-Thread: 101ff2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101ff2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-21 12:08:12 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!btnet-peer1!btnet-peer0!btnet!dispose.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!romana.davros.org!on-the-train.demon.co.uk!clive From: "Clive D. W. Feather" <clive@on-the-train.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.net.regulation,alt.privacy,uk.politics.censorship,demon.service,uk.gov.social-security,uk.politics.crime,uk.telecom.mobile,alt.anonymous.email Subject: Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ? Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:15:03 +0000 Organization: Demon Internet Message-ID: <+zlBtis3o4I8EwNn@on-the-train.demon.co.uk> References: <ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <7shl1u04alrar0oioclepforvct06orpe9@4ax.com> <jlHS7.107$7v6.186801@monolith.news.easynet.net> <+5jhP3MRtaH8Ew1O@romana.davros.org> <o4xT7.1414$8%.418515@monolith.news.easynet.net> Reply-To: "Clive D.W. Feather" <clive@davros.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: romana.davros.org X-NNTP-Posting-Host: romana.davros.org:194.217.240.35 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1008965261 nnrp-10:27247 NO-IDENT romana.davros.org:194.217.240.35 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed User-Agent: Turnpike/6.01-Beta-1-U (<81yImECxEkLwWkbKTSiEkLA3nC>) Lines: 35