Article View: uk.net.regulation
Article #23Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ?
From: karen
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:16
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:16
35 lines
3211 bytes
3211 bytes
In article <slrna20ijg.tjm.chris@ccserver.keris.net>, "Chris Croughton" <chris@keristor.org> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 21:57:27 -0000, anthonyberet > <Reply@newsgrouponly.net> wrote: > >>karen <karen@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk> wrote in message >>news:20011218.141113.1626276121.169@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk... >>> >>> All my ISP will get is a multi PGP encrypted mail, they can store my >>> outgoing mail but will not be able to read it. As for keystroke >>> recorders there are rumours, well a little more than rumour now that >>> the FBI are doing this sort of thing but you would have to have little >>> control and or knowledge about your system for them to get away with >>> it, not very likely, at least on a linux/unix system, I cant comment >>> on windows, except that I know windows seems to be full of holes and >>> bugs!. >>> >>http://www.google.com/search?q=keystroke+recorder > > All the ones I see there are (a) for Windoze or Mac and (b) voluntarily > installed (and you have to pay for most of them). Since I (a) don't use > Windoze or Mac for anything sensitive (the only path my Windoze machines > -- which I have for doing music editing -- have to the net is via my > server/firewall running Squid as a proxy) and (b) would not voluntarily > install anything of that nature (much less pay for it) there are no 'key > grabbers' which will affect me. Horay, a fellow Unix user, watchout there a guy in here who will readily acuse us of being one and the same person!... > > Chris C
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<20011219.151602.706043324.175@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!ppp-1-2.5800-9.access.uk.worldonline.COM!not-for-mailReferences:
<ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <FGAT5LHQ37241.3972916667@anonymous.poster> <7DwT7.23056$4e3.3036669@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com> <20011218.141113.1626276121.169@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk> <51PT7.35695$pU3.4264864@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <slrna20ijg.tjm.chris@ccserver.keris.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fad9d,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public X-Google-Thread: 10b38e,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b38e,public X-Google-Thread: 104271,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid104271,public X-Google-Thread: f6b0a,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf6b0a,public X-Google-Thread: 101ff2,a1dd5a245a537fd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101ff2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-19 06:15:13 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!ppp-1-2.5800-9.access.uk.worldonline.COM!not-for-mail From: "karen" <karen@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.net.regulation,alt.privacy,uk.politics.censorship,demon.service,uk.gov.social-security Subject: Re: Poll: for/against Net surveillance in UK Anti-Terrorism law ? Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 15:16:11 +0000 Lines: 35 Message-ID: <20011219.151602.706043324.175@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk> References: <ZmvS7.52$7v6.68239@monolith.news.easynet.net> <FGAT5LHQ37241.3972916667@anonymous.poster> <7DwT7.23056$4e3.3036669@news6-win.server.ntlworld.com> <20011218.141113.1626276121.169@redshift1.worldonline.co.uk> <51PT7.35695$pU3.4264864@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> <slrna20ijg.tjm.chris@ccserver.keris.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-1-2.5800-9.access.uk.worldonline.com (62.64.168.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1008771312 17916756 62.64.168.2 (16 [75584]) X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail User-Agent: Pan/0.9.7 (Unix)