Article View: uk.net.regulation
Article #6IWF report -> ISP removal of ng turnaround time
From: Wm...
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 22:10
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 22:10
38 lines
2695 bytes
2695 bytes
Please note crosspost when replying. I think my posting is relevant to both groups, you decide about your reply. === In mid February this year I reported a group that Demon carried to the IWF and included an example posting (I think the posting, which was part of a series, was cancelled at the time). Sometime in the last few days Demon pulled the ng, presumably as a result of a notification from the IWF along with a few others [1] What I'm wondering about is the turnaround time and where the bottleneck was. Two and a half months seems a bit long to me (though I did wonder for a while if it had been decided that the group's content was deemed OK) for the report to ng pull turnaround time. Does this amount of time match with other people's experience? Before anyone in d.s yells hypocrite I think the group in question ought to have been pulled yonks ago, unlike some of the others that those with long memories may recall I think shouldn't have been pulled at all. [1] why alt.binaries.erotica.teen was pulled at the same time but alt.binaries.erotica.teen.female wasn't defies all sensibility to me. I suppose the reason for my posting is that I still don't think this is working. Groups that should be pulled take (relatively) ages to be pulled and groups that shouldn't be pulled do get pulled. Maybe someone that understands it will have the courage to explain it all to us. Or at least try ... -- Wm ... address valid for at least 31 days from date of posting
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Qs+7mTBsDF28EwJn@tarrcity.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk!tarrcity.demon.co.uk!tcnw51Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fad9d,45e623c4f6d82b45,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfad9d,public X-Google-Thread: 101ff2,45e623c4f6d82b45,start X-Google-Attributes: gid101ff2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-07 15:12:02 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!news.demon.co.uk!demon!no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk!tarrcity.demon.co.uk!tcnw51 From: "Wm..." <tcnw51@tarrcity.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.net.regulation,demon.service Subject: IWF report -> ISP removal of ng turnaround time Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:10:52 +0100 Organization: n/a Message-ID: <Qs+7mTBsDF28EwJn@tarrcity.demon.co.uk> Reply-To: "Wm ..." <tcnw51@tarrcity.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk:62.49.249.18 X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 1020809479 nnrp-01:26225 NO-IDENT no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk:62.49.249.18 X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed User-Agent: Turnpike/6.01-U (<qwy8xw4Rxn4Xw0KndK702ol58f>) Lines: 38