🚀 go-pugleaf

COME OUT OF YOUR CONFUSION ON OUR WEBSITE:

http://www.seventh-dayadventism.com

Once upon a time we as Americans lived our lives without fear.
Everyone had to confess there was indeed something great about America
that must be even confessed even to this date.  But then something
strange suddenly came along.  In 1991 we had a war against Iraq.  It
was called, Operation Desert Storm.  After that war, President George
Bush, Sr. began to tell us about something called a NEW WORLD ORDER.

What was this?  Where did the concept come from?  When did it start?
Who are involved in its construction besides President George Bush,
Sr.?  Amazingly in that major discussion, the former president did not
elaborate.  At such a critical time on a podium before the entire
world, what was the agenda to bring this up, and then leave it cold
and flat?  Anyone who wanted to find out what it was had to study
history.  Some already knew that it was the dream of Adolf Hitler.
Some already knew it was the object of Communism.  The problem was
that only a few knew.  Independent publications were talking about
this as a growing agenda and concern among American leadership.  They
were claiming it was an anti-Constitutional agenda.  But, with most
dialogue today, people are sent to confuse and gridlock to the point
where the American people believe there is no consequence for
believing the wrong thing.  But for a long time, such people who
supported this concept, like the ones of history, began to say that
the American people are "too free."  They were saying that there is a
necessity of giving up "some of" their liberties, because this would
be necessary for security.  They were just as free as they were for
200 years.  Those 200 years proved that with their liberties, their
security was intact.  Some Americans knew that this concept was
something new to America, but not to brutal regimes: that they have to
give up their liberties to achieve something they always had with
their liberties for most of the history of this country: SECURITY.
Most brutal regimes claimed that liberties must be either limited or
non-existent for SECURITY to be maintained.  But now something strange
recently happened.

On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, two airplanes plowed right into the
World Trade Center buildings.  The American people were shocked.
Those planes just marched clear in and through.  No military jets were
seen around them neither to stop them nor to even ask for ID, ransom,
etc.  Dick Cheney was asked how they were able to just march through
like that and why military jets were not around to stop them, and
immediately and again, something followed that gave ammunition to the
big bad ol' "Conspiracy theorists" that are out to get us:  a lie.
Cheney claimed that those military jets were not sent because they
didn't want to SHOOT DOWN the passenger planes that were used as
missiles.  In other words, if a plane even strays off course, he was
saying that if military jets were sent, they are supposed to shoot
them down instead of requesting ID and information on what they want,
where they're going, etc.  This constitutes the first major QUESTION
that the "conspiracy theorists" demand answers for that have not been
answered to date.  A strange team of people are constantly sent to
make sure the questions are NOT answered.

In the 1970s when I was in high school, a report appeared of how a
small airplane strayed into Kremlin airspace in the former Soviet
Union.  At that time the Soviet Union was considered a power to be
reckoned with.  As a result of what happened, THE REPORT SHOWED THAT
THE KREMLIN LEADERS TURNED ABSOLUTELY RED IN THE FACE!

This time not only was the airspace in the greatest nation in the
world compromised, BUT 3,000 LIVES WERE SNUFFED OUT!  But this time
was different.  This time not only did the faces of the American
leaders NOT turn red, but actual pictures of the tragedy were used in
the President's re-election campaign that took place on his watch!  It
was as if he was proud that he failed to stop the tragedy.  His
subsequent demands proved that he was proud of his failure.

This was an unprecedented circumstance to befall a president.  But
from that day to this, though this president failed to protect the
American people, he began to claim rewards and benefits for failing to
protect America.  His first move was to stand on the top of a seeming
pulpit at Ground Zero telling the world that he is about to destroy
"all evil."  No sign of distress or even embarrassment was shown on
his face.  If a president fails to protect the people, is he supposed
to be given powers above his presidential oath of office and be made a
king?  All the other presidents who protected us were not given such
benefits.  If the day comes when we reward presidents for failing to
do their jobs (albeit he was outsmarted) how is it we cannot tell that
such presidents will fail us again?

The president then "concocts" something called "The Patriot Act,"
which is a reward package for himself for failing to protect the
American people.  This Act is a package of laws that claims the
president can arrest and detain anyone just on his accusation alone of
having ties to terrorists.  Once accused, the victim has no due
process nor legal recourse to even prove his innocence.  He is accused
and tried in secret.  There is no set date for his release since he
may never be released at all forever, and even judges cannot look over
the matter.  The President, from that time forward, began to press
that this is a "Constitutional" and "Vital" law.  In fact a law we
never needed until he came along.  From that time and in spotty
places, the same people began to tell us that the Constitution is an
"outdated" document.

Unfortunately these laws and principles were already adopted and
practiced by the Inquisitors of Rome before this country started and
which this country was a protest to, it was practiced also by the
Communists and by the Nazis.  President Bush didn't give these brutal
systems any form of credit for having these principles before he
introduced them to the American people.  Even worse is the fact that
President Bill Clinton, another New World Order devotee, already
pushed for the very same principles contained in the Patriot Act to be
established into law with his 1995 Omnibus Anti-terrorism proposals.
He also was given no credit for the so-called, "hard decisions" Bush
claims that he has to make as he is empowered to bypass the
constitution through failing to protect the American people.

Though this country more than survived and prospered almost all its
existence for over 200 years without this "new" package of laws, it
was advertised as if we cannot exist without it.  The American people
were always secure with their full liberties before Bush.  Then, like
the former people who wanted a New World Order, a propaganda team
emerged to bake us in the deception.  The question emerged, "How come
we never needed such rules before Bush?"  The propaganda team was set
into motion.

They began to say that this country always suffered from terrorism.
If that were true, then this country always needed The Patriot Act.
How then did it survive and prospered so long without it and before
Bush?  They began to show us that acts of war even is TERRORISM as we
understand it today.  Pearl Harbor, that took place before WWII, was
an act of terrorism.  We then asked them if the Patriot Act was needed
back then, and they ducked, dodged and hid from giving the answer.  We
asked them for a timeline since the first president of the United
States: George Washington.  We reminded them that Middle Eastern
Muslim extremists were always around since the first president.  We
were free back then.  They must have hated us because we were free
even back then.  Since all in the equation are equal, we asked them to
show us how the Patriot Act was around back then or was needed back
then.  They used great talent to duck the question and preserve the
confusion.

They told us that President Bush is the only president that takes the
most effective stance against terrorism: instead of swatting
mosquitoes as they told us all the former Presidents did, they told us
that President Bush makes and starts wars with countries that sponsor
terrorism, therefore spraying the pond where the mosquitoes are
created.  This, according to them, is what makes the Constitution an
"outdated" document.
One plus one equals two:  If terrorism was always with us, and and the
only effective method for combating it is starting illegal wars and
the Patriot Act, HOW FAR BACK WAS THE CONSTITUTION "OUTDATED?"  How
far back were the principles found in the Geneva Conventions
"outdated?"  From that time the American people are supposed to
understand that the people these questions are directed to are the
actual enemies of liberty and the United States.  From the beginning,
it was only the determined enemies of the United States who believed
that the Constitution of the United States was "outdated" from the
very time of its creation.

The propaganda team was asked to gage the usage of the word TERRORISM
in our news media, our magazine periodicals, the internet, and even
the textbooks in our schools of higher learning and even elementary
schools before President Bush, and they pretended they couldn't
comprehend what we were asking.  What would be the result if we asked
our grandmothers and grandfathers about the existence and frequency of
that word in all the reading materials they had when they were growing
up, what would they tell you?  If we were to ask our parents about the
frequency of that word and concern in their lives before President
Bush, what would they tell you?  They would tell you that the concern
just was not there.  The problem is that Middle Eastern Muslim
extremists were back there back then.  Every variable in the equation
back then was there as today EXCEPT PRESIDENT BUSH AND THE OTHER NEW
WORLD ORDER LOYALISTS.  Many of them would tell you that if anyone
brought up a set of laws like the Patriot Act back then, they would
recognize him as an enemy of liberty and the American Constitution.

Just check the Google Newsgroup Archives, set into operation in 1981,
and gage the frequency and use of the word TERRORISM from the
beginning till President Bush.  What will you find?  You will find
actually that the more American leaders told us about this NEW WORLD
ORDER business, was the more the word and concern for terrorism grew
and grew till it exploded since President Bush.

Putting it bluntly:

The propaganda team told us that 911 took place because President Bill
Clinton had "laxed" policies on terrorism.  The actual fact is, BILL
CLINTON HAD STRONGER POLICIES AGAINST TERRORISM THAN ALL THE OTHER
PRESIDENTS BEFORE HIM.  AND YET, THE FURTHER BACK WE GO IN THE LIST OF
PRESIDENTS THIS COUNTRY EVER HAD WAS THE MORE LAXED WERE THEIR
POLICIES AGAINST TERRORISM, AND, IN FACT,...

THE MORE THE ISSUE OF TERRORISM NEVER BOTHERED US!!

Why therefore should the American people always be stumped and baffled
about this seemingly perplexing subject of terrorism and why it is
here among us?  

Stay with us, and...

COME OUT OF YOUR CONFUSION!

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----