Article View: uk.rec.audio
Article #288Re: Problem with NAD 521i
From: Alfred Schmidt
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 21:26
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 21:26
47 lines
3040 bytes
3040 bytes
"allain" <allain_sel@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:3CF20DB5.3ADC7CAE@yahoo.com... > Hi Alfred, > if you have problems why not going to Audio Electronics. > He is very friendly guy and will certainly help if possible, even exchange the > player for newer charge if that helps. > And it is only around the corner in the Himberger Strasse 27 (im 10 Bezirk) > They exchanged my S500 two years ago because of skipping. > > regards > Allain > HI Allain Thank you, for your letter. But *at the moment* I have no problem. My third player plays *almost* without skpping-problems, and from my about 1100 CDs there are AFAIK only 4, which will not run with this player, or better said, they will run if you try it with several tricks. Audio-electronics is very custumer-friendly, *but* of course they have to live with the player, how it is constructed, they cannon make it better, then it is. And from this point of view (reliability, skipping, error-correction) this set, or more exactly this generation of units (520/521/521i,540,541,541i) IMO ist not even "Consumer-ware-Quality" If you then write on NADs Home-page answering this: "If you have a question or would like to drop NAD a longer personal note please email nad@NADelectronics.com." you get no answer. OK *But* if then somebody asks here: Ist the problem of my NAD-Player 521 all well-known problem ? Then I write : YES YES YES. It is well known. Because there is no company in the world, which may ignore a letter from me without any consequence................ compliments from Vienna Alfred
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<acu8j3$pn91i$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!n428p027.adsl.highway.telekom.AT!not-for-mailReferences:
<cabbcd20.0205250256.7b774604@posting.google.com> <acoo62$r1p3n$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> <Xns921A566C05799Oscillatusspamblock@210.49.20.254> <acp9ku$7rd$1@news.ox.ac.uk> <3cf02bd9$0$4694$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <acqu3l$rk7v9$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> <3CF20DB5.3ADC7CAE@yahoo.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109f11,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: f6728,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gid108c0a,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-27 14:31:17 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!n428p027.adsl.highway.telekom.AT!not-for-mail From: "Alfred Schmidt" <aon.912412123@aon.at> Newsgroups: uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc Subject: Re: Problem with NAD 521i Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 23:26:18 +0200 Lines: 53 Message-ID: <acu8j3$pn91i$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> References: <cabbcd20.0205250256.7b774604@posting.google.com> <acoo62$r1p3n$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> <Xns921A566C05799Oscillatusspamblock@210.49.20.254> <acp9ku$7rd$1@news.ox.ac.uk> <3cf02bd9$0$4694$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au> <acqu3l$rk7v9$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> <3CF20DB5.3ADC7CAE@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: n428p027.adsl.highway.telekom.at (213.33.53.123) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1022535075 26977330 213.33.53.123 (16 [74364]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700