Article View: uk.rec.audio
Article #297Re: Problem with NAD 521i
From: Pim
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 00:21
Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 00:21
21 lines
2310 bytes
2310 bytes
> > I changed my NAD twice, but each unit had other problems. > > > > > Similar experience here. It's weired - I've heard such conflicting things about all NAD products - had me heart set on a 370 / 270 combo, but then I heard soooooo many poer supply hum problems, that I bailed - since then, I've heard loads of reports about how good / bad all NAD products are - seemingly due to them building them in 2 locations - parrently one factory puts out quality gear, and the other is shite. i can't say whether this is fact or not, but I've heard it from quite a few sources now... seems a pity that a manufacturer that can put out such really high quality gear can let standards slip like that... --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.362 / Virus Database: 199 - Release Date: 08/05/02
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<acp9ku$7rd$1@news.ox.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!news.ox.ac.uk!not-for-mailReferences:
<cabbcd20.0205250256.7b774604@posting.google.com> <acoo62$r1p3n$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> <Xns921A566C05799Oscillatusspamblock@210.49.20.254>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f6728,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gidf6728,public X-Google-Thread: 109f11,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gid109f11,public X-Google-Thread: 108c0a,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gid108c0a,public X-Google-Thread: 10d85e,1ad22e9b19e540eb X-Google-Attributes: gid10d85e,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-25 17:18:41 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!news.ox.ac.uk!not-for-mail From: "Pim" <Pim@Pim.pim> Newsgroups: uk.rec.audio,aus.hi-fi,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc Subject: Re: Problem with NAD 521i Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 01:21:26 +0100 Organization: Oxford University, England Lines: 23 Message-ID: <acp9ku$7rd$1@news.ox.ac.uk> References: <cabbcd20.0205250256.7b774604@posting.google.com> <acoo62$r1p3n$1@ID-74364.news.dfncis.de> <Xns921A566C05799Oscillatusspamblock@210.49.20.254> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcpfh191.bnc.ox.ac.uk X-Trace: news.ox.ac.uk 1022372319 8045 163.1.179.191 (26 May 2002 00:18:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@ox.ac.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 00:18:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000