🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.rec.driving
Article #2012

Re: Parking again - paying by mobile

#2012
From: Zimmy
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30
55 lines
3918 bytes
On 28/11/2011 13:51, Ian Jackson wrote:
> In message <9jhbtaFjsoU2@mid.individual.net>, JNugent
> <jenningsltd@fastmail.fm> writes
>> On 26/11/2011 21:47, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> In message <faqdnRkurYT9JE3TnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, Nick
>>> Finnigan
>>> <nix@genie.co.uk> writes
>>>> On 25/11/2011 13:25, Zimmy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I got to thinking; the Parking Warden must look up the car on his
>>>>> portable computer as there is no ticket to stick on the windscreen
>>>>> when you
>>>>> pay by mobile. Therefore, there's no real reason why said portable
>>>>> computer
>>>>> can't also alert said Parking Warden to mobile-paid parking times
>>>>> about to
>>>>> expire, to ensure timely ticketing before the felon returns.
>>>>
>>>> Anything pre-pay could contact a central location and then alert the PW
>>>> when a ticket is about to expire - might have a partial reg in some
>>>> cases.
>>>> Or the PW could note times in his PC as he proceeds around the
>>>> parking areas.
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe paying by mobile is not quite so handy after all or am I just
>>>>> cynic?
>>>>
>>>> ... or not sufficiently paranoid.
>>>
>>> Of course, the system could work as follows:
>>> 1. 'Phone in' at start of parking period.
>>> 2. 'Phone in' again at end of parking period.
>>> 3. Get charged for time spent parking.
>>> Or is this just TOOOOO easy?
>>
>> Many people would forget the second call and cost themselves money.
>> Not bad from the rip-off merch...er... council's POV.
>
> But this is essentially the same as the 'lost ticket' situation in a
> pay-on-foot carpark, where typically there is charge for a full day's
> stay (usually around �25).
>
> There could be various simple procedures for damage limitation. For
> example, what if your clock-in included an estimated duration (so it
> would be exactly the same as at present). However, you wouldn't be
> penalised if you stayed after it expired. Instead, at the expiry time,
> you would be sent an automatic reminder that you hadn't clocked out, and
> you would be prompted to do so (if you wanted to). Repeated reminders
> could be sent every hour. Maybe still not 100% perfect, but not far from
> it.

Sounds like a sensible system to me. But then the council wouldn't be 
able to charge the �30 fine for the 5 mins you went over?

Z
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jb05v2$jgv$1@dont-email.me>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni30583pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <jao4p0$6mr$1@dont-email.me> <jao518$92p$1@dont-email.me> <faqdnRkurYT9JE3TnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <J$R7ZAEL6V0OFwwF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <9jhbtaFjsoU2@mid.individual.net> <hiVheVBYH50OFwUF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104960,9ac68a4393c6d469
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 109765,bdc2d969d663682b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid73efed67cd,gida91e4e313e,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr26014512pbc.7.1322490659293;
        Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni30583pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Zimmy <z@y.x>
Newsgroups: uk.rec.driving,ed.general
Subject: Re: Parking again - paying by mobile
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30:21 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <jb05v2$jgv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <jao4p0$6mr$1@dont-email.me> <jao518$92p$1@dont-email.me> <faqdnRkurYT9JE3TnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <J$R7ZAEL6V0OFwwF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <9jhbtaFjsoU2@mid.individual.net> <hiVheVBYH50OFwUF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30:58 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="JEMKl3gGVqVG5WA+8XMg2A";
 logging-data="19999"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19d3/RUmGI8Ekfny7bIHLou"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To: <hiVheVBYH50OFwUF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MBBTk8sUkSLMbZRTQw+mw3btjbg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit