Article View: uk.rec.driving
Article #2012Re: Parking again - paying by mobile
From: Zimmy
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30
55 lines
3918 bytes
3918 bytes
On 28/11/2011 13:51, Ian Jackson wrote: > In message <9jhbtaFjsoU2@mid.individual.net>, JNugent > <jenningsltd@fastmail.fm> writes >> On 26/11/2011 21:47, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> In message <faqdnRkurYT9JE3TnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>, Nick >>> Finnigan >>> <nix@genie.co.uk> writes >>>> On 25/11/2011 13:25, Zimmy wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Then I got to thinking; the Parking Warden must look up the car on his >>>>> portable computer as there is no ticket to stick on the windscreen >>>>> when you >>>>> pay by mobile. Therefore, there's no real reason why said portable >>>>> computer >>>>> can't also alert said Parking Warden to mobile-paid parking times >>>>> about to >>>>> expire, to ensure timely ticketing before the felon returns. >>>> >>>> Anything pre-pay could contact a central location and then alert the PW >>>> when a ticket is about to expire - might have a partial reg in some >>>> cases. >>>> Or the PW could note times in his PC as he proceeds around the >>>> parking areas. >>>> >>>>> Maybe paying by mobile is not quite so handy after all or am I just >>>>> cynic? >>>> >>>> ... or not sufficiently paranoid. >>> >>> Of course, the system could work as follows: >>> 1. 'Phone in' at start of parking period. >>> 2. 'Phone in' again at end of parking period. >>> 3. Get charged for time spent parking. >>> Or is this just TOOOOO easy? >> >> Many people would forget the second call and cost themselves money. >> Not bad from the rip-off merch...er... council's POV. > > But this is essentially the same as the 'lost ticket' situation in a > pay-on-foot carpark, where typically there is charge for a full day's > stay (usually around �25). > > There could be various simple procedures for damage limitation. For > example, what if your clock-in included an estimated duration (so it > would be exactly the same as at present). However, you wouldn't be > penalised if you stayed after it expired. Instead, at the expiry time, > you would be sent an automatic reminder that you hadn't clocked out, and > you would be prompted to do so (if you wanted to). Repeated reminders > could be sent every hour. Maybe still not 100% perfect, but not far from > it. Sounds like a sensible system to me. But then the council wouldn't be able to charge the �30 fine for the 5 mins you went over? Z
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jb05v2$jgv$1@dont-email.me>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni30583pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mailReferences:
<jao4p0$6mr$1@dont-email.me> <jao518$92p$1@dont-email.me> <faqdnRkurYT9JE3TnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <J$R7ZAEL6V0OFwwF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <9jhbtaFjsoU2@mid.individual.net> <hiVheVBYH50OFwUF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 104960,9ac68a4393c6d469
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: 109765,bdc2d969d663682b
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid73efed67cd,gida91e4e313e,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.15.105 with SMTP id w9mr26014512pbc.7.1322490659293;
Mon, 28 Nov 2011 06:30:59 -0800 (PST)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!lh20ni30583pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Zimmy <z@y.x>
Newsgroups: uk.rec.driving,ed.general
Subject: Re: Parking again - paying by mobile
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30:21 +0000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <jb05v2$jgv$1@dont-email.me>
References: <jao4p0$6mr$1@dont-email.me> <jao518$92p$1@dont-email.me> <faqdnRkurYT9JE3TnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <J$R7ZAEL6V0OFwwF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> <9jhbtaFjsoU2@mid.individual.net> <hiVheVBYH50OFwUF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:30:58 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="JEMKl3gGVqVG5WA+8XMg2A";
logging-data="19999"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19d3/RUmGI8Ekfny7bIHLou"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To: <hiVheVBYH50OFwUF@g3ohx.demon.co.uk>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MBBTk8sUkSLMbZRTQw+mw3btjbg=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit