🚀 go-pugleaf

Harry Bloomfield wrote:
> Naked Gonad expressed precisely :
>> Thanks for the info.The trouble is, that I'm getting mixed 
>> answers,depending which report I read.There doesn't seem to be a 
>> definitive and straight answer to this.
> 
> There do not seem to be any straight answers available, the only clues 
> seem to be the fact that people are experimenting and freely publishing 
> their designs.
> 
>> I wish there were an independent board who could give categoric 
>> answers to these queries,like mpg difference per model and all the 
>> fors and againsts of a conversion.Also is there any hidden long term 
>> adverse affects on say,catalytic converters(will they deteriorate 
>> quicker etc).
> 
> The only figures I could find were those of companies trying to sell the 
> kits. Those who are amateurs who are experimenting seem to suggest the 
> kits are a complete waste of money and achieve nothing.
> 
> Looking at it logically, it is yet another form of perpetual motion - 
> except for the fact that they experimenters insist it does work.
> 
> Basically you use petrol to turn the engine, the engine generates 
> electrical power via the alternator. The electrical power is used to 
> turn water into HHO or Brown's gas, which is extremely explosive, the 
> same gas as is given off by your battery when it is fully charged. You 
> add the gas to your intake manifold and it burns along with the petrol.
> 
> So the only possible way it can work is for it to make the combustion 
> process much more efficient and only then if you can fool your ECU into 
> working with the more efficient combustion process. Older carburettor 
> engines can be run as is, without any such changes, so I understand. The 
> changes involves adding a small gadget to the oxygen sensor, to adjust 
> its voltage - or re-mapping the ECU.
> 
> What does work without any doubt and without any modifications, is a 
> regular dose of injector cleaner once a year - or at least it has worked 
> wonders on my 3L car for this the second year of using it. It boosted 
> the mpg from low 20's last year to around 27mpg. I have just used it 
> again last week and seen the same thing happen, all as indicated by the 
> fuelling computer. The difference the first time was quite gradual over 
> the use of a tankful, but this time it was almost instant - over a 
> distance of 8 or so miles from adding the stuff along with a good 
> increase in engine performance.
> 
> I last used it about ten years ago on my current cars predecessor and 
> saw no noticeable difference.
> 
Appreciate your feedback,I will try and take all that on board.I did 
however know about the HHO stuff(sort of).Thanks again Sir.

Gonad