Article View: uk.rec.models.rail
Article #38Re: Substation spacing - 3rd rail
From: David Winter
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:43
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:43
45 lines
2988 bytes
2988 bytes
How does one find the railway technical pages from the trainweb home page? DW "David Bennetts" <davibee@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:oVdf9.3227$Sr6.111820@ozemail.com.au... : The railway technical pages at www.trainweb.org will give you some answers: : : "DC, on the other hand was the preferred option for shorter lines, urban : systems and tramways. However, it was also used on a number of main line : railway systems, and still is in some parts of continental Europe, for : example. Apart from only requiring a simple control system for the motors, : the smaller size of urban operations meant that trains were usually lighter : and needed less power. Of course, it needed a heavier transmission medium, a : third rail or a thick wire, to carry the power and it lost a fair amount of : voltage as the distance between supply connections increased. This was : overcome by placing substations at close intervals - every three or four : kilometres at first, nowadays two or three on a 750 volt system - compared : with every 20 kilometres or so for a 25 kV AC line". : : Generally voltages were low on old systems because electrical gear was heavy : and bulky if needed to reduce voltages for the DC motors, designed to : operate at around 600 volts. 1920s London tube stock for example had : about a third of each motor carriage devoted to the control gear, if you had : to reduce voltage from the line supply with the technology then available : you would have lost considerably more revenue space. : : Regards : : David Bennetts : : : : : : : :
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<zthf9.3417$Sr6.113577@ozemail.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<MPbf9.3193$Sr6.110768@ozemail.com.au> <oVdf9.3227$Sr6.111820@ozemail.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10befb,4a0592ad45abdc07 X-Google-Attributes: gid10befb,public X-Google-Thread: fb12d,4a0592ad45abdc07 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb12d,public X-Google-Thread: f73ba,4a0592ad45abdc07 X-Google-Attributes: gidf73ba,public X-Google-Thread: 11469f,4a0592ad45abdc07 X-Google-Attributes: gid11469f,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-10 00:48:48 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news1.optus.net.au!optus!snewsf0.syd.ops.aspac.uu.net!ozemail.com.au!not-for-mail From: "David Winter" <winterdspamtrapper@icespamtrapnet.com.au.invalid> Newsgroups: uk.rec.models.rail,uk.railway,uk.transport.london,aus.rail References: <MPbf9.3193$Sr6.110768@ozemail.com.au> <oVdf9.3227$Sr6.111820@ozemail.com.au> Subject: Re: Substation spacing - 3rd rail Lines: 47 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: <zthf9.3417$Sr6.113577@ozemail.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: ice-159.icenet.com.au X-Trace: ozemail.com.au 1031644127 203.161.122.159 (Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:48:47 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:48:47 EST Organization: OzEmail Ltd, Australia Distribution: world Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 15:43:02 +0800