Thread View: uk.rec.walking
12 messages
12 total messages
Started by Andrew Priest
Sun, 21 May 2006 01:53
Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Andrew Priest
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 01:53
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 01:53
11 lines
1372 bytes
1372 bytes
G'day Interested to know if anyone has experience with the Optimus Stella + stove (see http://www.optimus.se/product.asp?id=8 ) or comments on the design. Bit lighter than the MSR Windpro and I like that it folds down pretty flat. Other thoughts? Thanks Andrew
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Dave
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:55
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 04:55
12 lines
2045 bytes
2045 bytes
I have an Optimus Nova multi-fuel stove. As far as liquid fuel stoves go it's performance, build quality, and toughness is outstanding. These days I almost never use it since I aquired a Kovea titanium gas stove and in terms of size, ease of use, safety, and weight, it wins on all counts. My only gripes with the Kovea are the burner sits on top of the gas cartridge so you have to be careful not to knock it over during cooking, plus you can't use a windshield. From what I can see of the Stella both those problems are eliminated, albeit at the expense of a bit of extra weight. Also, if the quality of the Stella is anything like the Nova, then I think it's a safe bet to go out and buy it. ~Dave
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Roger Caffin
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 05:07
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 05:07
14 lines
1688 bytes
1688 bytes
> My only gripes with the Kovea are the burner sits on top of the > gas cartridge so you have to be careful not to knock it over during > cooking, plus you can't use a windshield. How strange. I have been using a tight windshield around essentially the same stove for years. I'm still here ... The exploding canisters myth is fully explained in the FAQ, at http://www.bushwalking.org.au/FAQ/FAQ_StovesTech.htm#Hot Also read about windshields and radiation shields at http://www.bushwalking.org.au/FAQ/FAQ_StovesTech.htm#Wind Cheers Roger Caffin
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: norts
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:26
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 22:26
13 lines
1820 bytes
1820 bytes
My son melted the piezo ignition on my MSR Superfly when using a windshield. I now use a Kovea and the ignition is still in tact and I use a windshield. I use stabiliser legs on the gas bottle. 3 pieces of metal strapping and a piece of tyre tube from a wheelbarrow tyre. Tube goes over the bottle Strapping bent into a L shape and slipped under the tube. Works very well Roger
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Andrew Priest
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 01:34
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 01:34
11 lines
1599 bytes
1599 bytes
On 21 May 2006 15:26:39 -0700, "norts" <norts60@hotmail.com> wrote: >My son melted the piezo ignition on my MSR Superfly when using a >windshield. Sounds like improper usage of the windshield. I use them to provide three sides of protection, leaving one side open for heat to dissipate. Regards Andrew
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: David Springthorpe
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:49
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:49
16 lines
1555 bytes
1555 bytes
On 21 May 2006 15:26:39 -0700, "norts" <norts60@hotmail.com> wrote: >My son melted the piezo ignition on my MSR Superfly when using a >windshield. >I now use a Kovea and the ignition is still in tact and I use a >windshield. >I use stabiliser legs on the gas bottle. 3 pieces of metal strapping >and a piece of tyre tube from a wheelbarrow tyre. >Tube goes over the bottle >Strapping bent into a L shape and slipped under the tube. > >Works very well Any chance of a pitcher of it somewhere or other ? Thanks.
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Dave
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 07:27
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 07:27
10 lines
1940 bytes
1940 bytes
My statement re: windshield use is a reflection of explicit manufacturer warnings against doing so, that to date I have heeded. I appreciate your debunking the "eploding cannister myth". I'll try a windshield next time. However, the pompous, superior, and sarcastic tone of flourishes such as "How strange", and "I'm still here" are superfluous and spoil an otherwise useful post. I'm not an idiot, and I don't like being talked down to. It is not the slightest bit strange to follow prominent safety warnings. ~Dave.
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Roger Caffin
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 08:02
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 08:02
22 lines
2062 bytes
2062 bytes
Hi Dave > My statement re: windshield use is a reflection of explicit > manufacturer warnings against doing so, that to date I have heeded. I > appreciate your debunking the "eploding cannister myth". I'll try a > windshield next time. Great. > However, the pompous, superior, and sarcastic > tone of flourishes such as "How strange", and "I'm still here" are > superfluous and spoil an otherwise useful post. My apologies. Pompous and superior I deny (or try to avoid anyhow). Sarcasm was intended, but aimed at the corporate lawyers and marketeers who prefer to stonewall or parrot rather than be helpful. It was NOT aimed at you! > I'm not an idiot, and I don't like being talked down to. Fair go. I posted in an attempt to be helpful. I did try to inject some light-hearted humour along the way. Cheers Roger Caffin
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Andrew Priest
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:24
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 09:24
20 lines
2124 bytes
2124 bytes
On 22 May 2006 00:27:41 -0700, "Dave" <tachyon_99@yahoo.com> wrote: >My statement re: windshield use is a reflection of explicit >manufacturer warnings against doing so, that to date I have heeded. Hi Dave You need to keep in mind the manufacturer's perspective, which is that they are at risk of being held liable for a user's actions, so they tend to be very conservative in their warnings. For example my MSR Missing Link tent has warnings on it which if taken too seriously would mean the tent didn't get used outside the lounge, in fact that might even be risky ... the ceiling might fall down :-). My experience is that one has to get a balance ... I am not keen on a tight windshield, but do go with a three sided one which seems to be effective, whilst minimising any heat build-up. Andrew
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Dave
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 01:14
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 01:14
7 lines
1750 bytes
1750 bytes
Hi Roger. I interpreted the tone of your post a certain way and at the time it just irked me, and I snapped back (out of all proportion). I guess I was in a shoot first ask questions later kind of mood. My apologies for that. ~Dave.
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Glen F
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:47
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 00:47
19 lines
2279 bytes
2279 bytes
>> My son melted the piezo ignition on my MSR Superfly when >> using a windshield. > > Sounds like improper usage of the windshield. I use them > to provide three sides of protection, leaving one side > open for heat to dissipate. Absolutely, but it's easy to do. I've stuffed two piezo's on the Kovea that way, using "Al flashing-type" homemade windshields. Upright gas stoves are next to useless without a windshield. Recently I've been using a commercial folding shield (Coleman). This seems to suit tall canister-top stoves well; just the right height and arc length (only reaches 3/4 of the way round, max). But ... ridiculously expensive (~$30), heavy (but robust), and doesn't have Roger's canister -top reflector. I wonder how important that is, provided the arc length is kept well short of full circle?
Re: Comments? - Optimus Stella + Stove
Author: Roger Caffin
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 03:37
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 03:37
27 lines
2453 bytes
2453 bytes
Hi Glen > Upright gas stoves are next to useless without a windshield. Well ... not quite, but I understand what you mean :-) > Recently I've been using a commercial folding shield > (Coleman). This seems to suit tall canister-top stoves > well; just the right height and arc length (only reaches > 3/4 of the way round, max). But ... ridiculously expensive (~$30), heavy (but robust), > and doesn't have Roger's canister > -top reflector. I wonder how important that is, provided the > arc length is kept well short of full circle? No simple answer. 'It all depends'. A radiation shield made from the bottom of an Al-foil baking dish weighs VERY little - maybe 20 grams. (You can also use this stuff for the windscreen.) You can leave it off or put it on the stove depending on how hot the canister feels. That's what counts: the temperature of the canister. If you can keep your fingers on it, then you are fine - and well under the requirements of the Safety Standards. Of course, a small rad shield placed above the piezo button will protect it nicely too. A thought. Cheers Roger Caffin www.bushwalking.org.au/FAQ/
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads