🚀 go-pugleaf

On Dec 28, 8:01 am, "kdth...@earthlink.net"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/tree/browse_frm/thr...

On Dec 26, 4:51 am, Dawlish <pjg...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Of course. "We". <shakes head> Like I've just said on another thread,
> your definition would exclude almost every scientist on earth. How can
> you write total crap like that end expect anyone to believe it?-
Hear that sound?,,,,



,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

That's the sound of climate reform NOT BEING DEBATED IN US CONGRESS.
In the words of the beloved god of the pseudo religion of AGW, THE
DEBATE IS OVER.
HAHAHAhahahahHahahahHAHAHAHahahaha

This discourse which you don't hear, is actually three parts. In the
first part, the Believers are outlining their basic scientific case.
As you can see, it is just FILLED with direct confirmable scientific
findings.

In the second part the Believers are outlining a concise and proper
scientific calibration of what level of emission reductions are needed
to avert catastrophe and make sure that we do not commit economic
suicide without this remedy being ineffective and effective in time,
and thus suffering both catastrophes of global warming and the futile
effort of economic suicide to avert this.

The third part of this deafening and worldly important debate going
on, is the careful analysis of the implementation of the reforms by
all parties who have decided that their normal lives and economics
does not matter and all efforts and energies of societies should be
directed towards the holy cause, even more than other imperitives such
as the Marshall Plan after world war II, the actual war against the
Nazis, and the effort to launch rockets to the moon ahead of the
Soviets.

Amid all this concern and attention from politics and society, and the
whole world, the AGWers stand in the spotlight in adulation for their
devotion as public servants and scientists, who through the looking
glass they have developed built with the massive public funding, see
the future and the upcoming danger beyond the scope of empirical fact
and without the need of actual scientific method, to warn us and guide
us through the fog of our heathenistic use of carbon fuels, and into
the promised land of cooler climates, through their program of climate
reform.

KD