🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.tech.broadcast
Article #3

Re: Question about frequency modulation

#3
From: Eric C. Weaver
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:06
32 lines
2810 bytes
On May 27, 9:02 am, GreenXenon <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi:
...
> Increasing the modulator’s frequency will increase the rate in which
> the carrier frequency changes. So why is it impossible to transmit a
> higher-frequency modulator signal on a lower-frequency FM carrier
> signal?

It's not impossible but it gets really weird.   You get "negative
frequency" sidebands which wrap around zero and often become noise,
depending how they line up with the non-wrapped sidebands.

>
> I can understand how increasing the modulator’s amplitude will
> increase the bandwidth the carrier uses.
>
> I don’t understand how increasing the modulator’s frequency will
> increase the bandwidth taken up by the carrier. Higher modulator
> frequency simply means the carrier’s frequency will vary faster; it
> will not take up more frequencies unless the mod’s amplitude
> increases.

Somewhere out there, there's a Fourier Transform applet which will
show you what happens to the spectrum.   You get sidebands spaced at
multiples of the modulating frequency.

Executive summary:  FM (and its conjoined twin, phase modulation)
operate by advancing and retarding the progress of the carrier around
its "phase circle" if you will.  The changes in phase-progress
generate frequencies you might not at first expect.  It comes out to C
+- nM for a lot of integer "n".  The amplitude of each one  can be
predicted by something called Bessel Functions.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ed367c9e-022f-4881-a4c0-79d1f8c0c0c9@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1a86fd28-bebe-4f09-8d0b-1a6685d01ce3@b34g2000pra.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 6677282e41,92a1f2481226a01
X-Google-Attributes: gid6677282e41,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Eric C. Weaver" <weav@sigma.net>
Newsgroups: uk.tech.broadcast,alt.radio.broadcasting,aus.radio.broadcast,ba.broadcast
Subject: Re: Question about frequency modulation
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <ed367c9e-022f-4881-a4c0-79d1f8c0c0c9@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <1a86fd28-bebe-4f09-8d0b-1a6685d01ce3@b34g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.204.152.219
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243444006 23781 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2009 17:06:46 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:06:46 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.204.152.219; 
 posting-account=r7tKeQkAAADYnbTQiRvuNKxa_HRWfrbJ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.20) 
 Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)