Article View: uk.tech.broadcast
Article #3Re: Question about frequency modulation
From: Eric C. Weaver
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:06
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:06
32 lines
2810 bytes
2810 bytes
On May 27, 9:02 am, GreenXenon <glucege...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi: ... > Increasing the modulator’s frequency will increase the rate in which > the carrier frequency changes. So why is it impossible to transmit a > higher-frequency modulator signal on a lower-frequency FM carrier > signal? It's not impossible but it gets really weird. You get "negative frequency" sidebands which wrap around zero and often become noise, depending how they line up with the non-wrapped sidebands. > > I can understand how increasing the modulator’s amplitude will > increase the bandwidth the carrier uses. > > I don’t understand how increasing the modulator’s frequency will > increase the bandwidth taken up by the carrier. Higher modulator > frequency simply means the carrier’s frequency will vary faster; it > will not take up more frequencies unless the mod’s amplitude > increases. Somewhere out there, there's a Fourier Transform applet which will show you what happens to the spectrum. You get sidebands spaced at multiples of the modulating frequency. Executive summary: FM (and its conjoined twin, phase modulation) operate by advancing and retarding the progress of the carrier around its "phase circle" if you will. The changes in phase-progress generate frequencies you might not at first expect. It comes out to C +- nM for a lot of integer "n". The amplitude of each one can be predicted by something called Bessel Functions.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ed367c9e-022f-4881-a4c0-79d1f8c0c0c9@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1a86fd28-bebe-4f09-8d0b-1a6685d01ce3@b34g2000pra.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 6677282e41,92a1f2481226a01 X-Google-Attributes: gid6677282e41,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Eric C. Weaver" <weav@sigma.net> Newsgroups: uk.tech.broadcast,alt.radio.broadcasting,aus.radio.broadcast,ba.broadcast Subject: Re: Question about frequency modulation Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 34 Message-ID: <ed367c9e-022f-4881-a4c0-79d1f8c0c0c9@y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com> References: <1a86fd28-bebe-4f09-8d0b-1a6685d01ce3@b34g2000pra.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.204.152.219 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1243444006 23781 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2009 17:06:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: y6g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=209.204.152.219; posting-account=r7tKeQkAAADYnbTQiRvuNKxa_HRWfrbJ User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)