🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.tech.digital-tv
Article #173

Re: Australia rethinks switchover date

#173
From: Nobody Here
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:06
64 lines
3681 bytes
Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> wrote:
>> Nobody Here <news.reader@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Michael <someone@somewhere.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Apologies if this was posted earlier but it was on the news when I
>>>>> was recently in Oz and probably has some relevance to UK
>>>>> switchover plans. see
>>>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds24794.html
>>>>
>>>> It has. Australia has legislation to prevent DTT broadcasts of
>>>> channels that are not also available on analogue to prevent
>>>> fragmentation of the advertising revenue. They've been trying to
>>>> sell DTT to the Australian public on the basis of picture quality
>>>> so it's been a bit of a flop, not surprisingly.
>
>>> What are they transmitting digital on?
>
> VHF and UHF, more VHF than UHF.
>
>>> When I lived there 20 years ago most TV was on VHF,
>>> although one Sydney station was on UHF as well I believe.
>
> Yep, SBS.

Yes, that's right.  Never used to watch it, well rarely anyway.  It was
a bit European for our tastes at the time.  After 20 years in Europe
(well, England) though ...

>>> VHF used to suffer quite badly from reflections,
>>> maybe because of the long distances involved.
>
> Nope, no long distances involved.
>
> UHF has its own problems, particularly surprisingly deep holes.

I think they're longer distances than we use on UHF here in the UK,
it's rare to get a TV signal from more than 40 miles away.  Of course,
you have a different perspective on the word "long" ;-)  We're also
stuck in one of those deep holes.

>>> When we moved here we were (UK) we were
>>> astonished by the better picture quality, but it
>>> was also a new  TV which might have helped :-).
>>> Anyway, chances are that digital pictures
>>> will be better than VHF analogue ones,
>
> Corse they are.
>
>>> especially in the bush.
>
> Yep, some with basically unusable analog signals do fine with digital.

Well my Outlaws line in Inverell NSW and I think their TV comes from
Glen Innes, although I might be wrong, but the picture quality is very
poor (on analogue).  That might be for a number of reasons - it's
always been bad in the 25 years I've been going there, but certainly
it would be much *much* better were it digital.  Every time a plane
lands at the local airport there is a wobble in the pcture.

-- 
Nobby
Technical Details
Message-ID: <435d5af7$0$49795$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net!not-for-mail
References: <BqmdnQotdttpL8HeRVnyjg@brightview.com> <46epl1d3kp0gm0nu0ri4at8u5ej3vugd0b@4ax.com> <435cd545$0$6497$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net> <321ql1pi6o26fthvi52hmh8aqi6qp6tug2@4ax.com> <3s4rp5FmbcrtU1@individual.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f928c,7b35e53bd2fe4c0
X-Google-Thread: 112dd4,fdc3a891bdc4e38f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf928c,gid112dd4,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv,aus.tv.digital
From: Nobody Here <news.reader@invalid.invalid>
Subject: Re: Australia rethinks switchover date
References: <BqmdnQotdttpL8HeRVnyjg@brightview.com> <46epl1d3kp0gm0nu0ri4at8u5ej3vugd0b@4ax.com> <435cd545$0$6497$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net> <321ql1pi6o26fthvi52hmh8aqi6qp6tug2@4ax.com> <3s4rp5FmbcrtU1@individual.net>
Reply-To: news.reader@tnvalid.invalid
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Win32)
Date: 24 Oct 2005 22:06:49 GMT
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <435d5af7$0$49795$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64d6133f.ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net
X-Trace: DXC=0OH^FH[\eBNgY=F[jBe@@Ligd3Y`7Rb;N3_LeXC3B]SI2CQfaaFQ=ADOeZa<<kgJM@A:OLETQECEHUAW\:dNRLBC
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net