Article View: uk.tech.digital-tv
Article #173Re: Australia rethinks switchover date
From: Nobody Here
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:06
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:06
64 lines
3681 bytes
3681 bytes
Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote: > Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> wrote: >> Nobody Here <news.reader@invalid.invalid> wrote: >> >>> Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance@OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> wrote: >>>> Michael <someone@somewhere.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Apologies if this was posted earlier but it was on the news when I >>>>> was recently in Oz and probably has some relevance to UK >>>>> switchover plans. see >>>>> http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds24794.html >>>> >>>> It has. Australia has legislation to prevent DTT broadcasts of >>>> channels that are not also available on analogue to prevent >>>> fragmentation of the advertising revenue. They've been trying to >>>> sell DTT to the Australian public on the basis of picture quality >>>> so it's been a bit of a flop, not surprisingly. > >>> What are they transmitting digital on? > > VHF and UHF, more VHF than UHF. > >>> When I lived there 20 years ago most TV was on VHF, >>> although one Sydney station was on UHF as well I believe. > > Yep, SBS. Yes, that's right. Never used to watch it, well rarely anyway. It was a bit European for our tastes at the time. After 20 years in Europe (well, England) though ... >>> VHF used to suffer quite badly from reflections, >>> maybe because of the long distances involved. > > Nope, no long distances involved. > > UHF has its own problems, particularly surprisingly deep holes. I think they're longer distances than we use on UHF here in the UK, it's rare to get a TV signal from more than 40 miles away. Of course, you have a different perspective on the word "long" ;-) We're also stuck in one of those deep holes. >>> When we moved here we were (UK) we were >>> astonished by the better picture quality, but it >>> was also a new TV which might have helped :-). >>> Anyway, chances are that digital pictures >>> will be better than VHF analogue ones, > > Corse they are. > >>> especially in the bush. > > Yep, some with basically unusable analog signals do fine with digital. Well my Outlaws line in Inverell NSW and I think their TV comes from Glen Innes, although I might be wrong, but the picture quality is very poor (on analogue). That might be for a number of reasons - it's always been bad in the 25 years I've been going there, but certainly it would be much *much* better were it digital. Every time a plane lands at the local airport there is a wobble in the pcture. -- Nobby
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<435d5af7$0$49795$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<BqmdnQotdttpL8HeRVnyjg@brightview.com> <46epl1d3kp0gm0nu0ri4at8u5ej3vugd0b@4ax.com> <435cd545$0$6497$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net> <321ql1pi6o26fthvi52hmh8aqi6qp6tug2@4ax.com> <3s4rp5FmbcrtU1@individual.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f928c,7b35e53bd2fe4c0 X-Google-Thread: 112dd4,fdc3a891bdc4e38f X-Google-Attributes: gidf928c,gid112dd4,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!solnet.ch!solnet.ch!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv,aus.tv.digital From: Nobody Here <news.reader@invalid.invalid> Subject: Re: Australia rethinks switchover date References: <BqmdnQotdttpL8HeRVnyjg@brightview.com> <46epl1d3kp0gm0nu0ri4at8u5ej3vugd0b@4ax.com> <435cd545$0$6497$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader01.plus.net> <321ql1pi6o26fthvi52hmh8aqi6qp6tug2@4ax.com> <3s4rp5FmbcrtU1@individual.net> Reply-To: news.reader@tnvalid.invalid User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Win32) Date: 24 Oct 2005 22:06:49 GMT Lines: 64 Message-ID: <435d5af7$0$49795$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net> Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net) NNTP-Posting-Host: 64d6133f.ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net X-Trace: DXC=0OH^FH[\eBNgY=F[jBe@@Ligd3Y`7Rb;N3_LeXC3B]SI2CQfaaFQ=ADOeZa<<kgJM@A:OLETQECEHUAW\:dNRLBC X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net