Re: Y [Luminance] signal on FM carrier wave.

Article View: uk.tech.digital-tv

Article #208

Back to uk.tech.digital-tv Previous Next

#208

From: spamtrap1888
Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:40

18 lines
2361 bytes

On Nov 2, 6:36 pm, "Green Xenon [Radium]" <gluceg...@excite.com>
wrote:
> spamtrap1...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 5:36 pm, "Green Xenon [Radium]" <gluceg...@excite.com>
> > wrote:
> >>Roderick Stewart wrote:
> >>>Not gonna happen at all. If you try to modulate a 300Hz carrier with 5MHz
> >>>video you'll end up with a mess.
> >>So decrease the 5 MHz frequency to a frequency that is low enough not to
> >>cause any distortion on a 300 Hz carrier.
> > I'm thinking 6 Hz would work; maybe as much as 9 Hz.
>
> What are you talking about? 6 Hz or 9 Hz of what?

short attention span a problem for you?

>>a frequency that is low enough not to
>>cause any distortion on a 300 Hz carrier.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1194050407.541466.180480@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<472b9a39$0$20584$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <VA.000001a5.026b23b2@removethisbit.beeb.net> <472bb331$0$25644$4c368faf@roadrunner.com> <1194047368.142999.138020@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <472bc159$0$24323$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f928c,ab81b61b65e80ebd
X-Google-Thread: ffcae,ab81b61b65e80ebd
X-Google-Thread: 107cee,ab81b61b65e80ebd
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,ab81b61b65e80ebd
X-Google-Thread: fdad6,ab81b61b65e80ebd
X-Google-Attributes: gidf928c,gidffcae,gid107cee,gidf7d8a,gidfdad6,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  spamtrap1888@gmail.com
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv,uk.tech.broadcast,sci.electronics.misc,ba.broadcast,alt.radio.broadcasting
Subject: Re: Y [Luminance] signal on FM carrier wave.
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:40:07 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <1194050407.541466.180480@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <472b9a39$0$20584$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
   <VA.000001a5.026b23b2@removethisbit.beeb.net>
   <472bb331$0$25644$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
   <1194047368.142999.138020@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
   <472bc159$0$24323$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.12.150.107
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1194050408 13553 127.0.0.1 (3 Nov 2007 00:40:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 00:40:08 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <472bc159$0$24323$4c368faf@roadrunner.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=69.12.150.107;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0

Reply to Parent Message