🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: uk.tech.digital-tv
Article #9

Re: Using mobile phone as an internet radio

#9
From: Jeff Liebermann
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 04:26
71 lines
5194 bytes
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 05:55:15 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold@teachspin.com> wrote:

>On Oct 10, 11:50�pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Oct 2012 06:27:05 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
>>
>> <gher...@teachspin.com> wrote:
>> >Hi SEB. �Well I sent an email to Don klipstein on this topic. �And
>> >have permission to copy his reply.
>> ><from Don K. below>
>> >2: �In incandescent traffic signals, the bulbs for yellow last
>> >longer than for red and green. �So even after being switched on
>> >and off about a million times, on-time is still a significant
>> >factor in life expectancy.
>>
>> That means for my proposed test comparing a 50% duty cycle flashing
>> light bulb, with one that is on continuously, the continuous light
>> bulb will burn out first. �That's the opposite of what I saw with the
>> theater marquee bulbs. �Now, I'm really tempted to run the experiment.

>Experiments can be very useful.

Yep.  However, it's more fun to predict, speculate, guess, reverse
engineer, and maybe calculate.

>I'd worry most about how you turn on the bulbs.
>Maybe just some simple relays?

No.  I didn't want to life test the relay contacts, just the light
bulbs.  I have plenty of solid state switches that will suffice.  The
reason I wanted two was to make sure the voltage drop across the
switch was the same for both the flashing and continuous bulbs.

>1,000 hours isn't all that long.  (or are you going to over-voltage
>the bulbs?)
>I guess I'd want at least 10 bulbs in each group.  Say 60 watts.....
>1200 kW-hrs.

Much as I would like to use a rack of bulbs, 
<http://pinterest.com/pin/172122016978363241/>
<http://pinterest.com/pin/172122016978761590/>
I think two bulbs will suffice for a start.  The plan of the moment is
to use a variac to boost the voltage from 120VAC to about 135VAC,
which should reduce the 1000 hr life to a more tolerable 112 hrs.
Cut-n-paste from a previous posting:

Instead, an accelerated life test can be done with higher than normal
voltages.  
<http://www.welchallyn.com/documents/Lighting/OEM_Halogen_Lighting/MC3544HPX_Catalog_2_11_09.pdf>
For halogen bulbs, they use:
  Life = (Vdesign / Vapplied)^12.0 * Life at design voltage
For a 1000 hr lamp running at 120% of the rated voltage, the life
might be:
  life = (1/1.2)^12 * 1000 = 112 hrs
which is more reasonable.

>That's looking like more money than I'd want to spend on the
>electricity.

I'm trying to determine where to run the test.  I don't want a
flashing bulb in my bedroom.  I also don't want to run an unattended
rack of bulbs in the office which could become a fire hazard. Methinks
just 2 bulbs and a 3-4 day accelerated test will be sufficient.

>George H.

-- 
Jeff Liebermann     jeffl@cruzio.com
150 Felker St #D    http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann     AE6KS    831-336-2558
Technical Details
Message-ID: <676f789p08ppt4l3eaios9qav4gplklgab@4ax.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!jt13ni5208pbb.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
References: <6qdr68d021n5f0juu8fldnn63rietbp30v@4ax.com> <de99517e-e5e1-4f9d-91e0-412ab3171a05@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <VA.00000dad.004d8d90@escapetime.removethisbit.myzen.co.uk> <k4qf17$qv9$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx> <pdi478do5smmrom5434adftfr959ronmm7@4ax.com> <fece7656-e487-40a3-b50a-2bc763efdaf4@u19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <79gc785ot39fele33figctj1s7eg839d3t@4ax.com> <a6cd086d-6731-4426-b45c-1e0161a4e306@b8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f928c,9bee37cb532a5f52
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Thread: faa3c,9bee37cb532a5f52
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gid69d4707089,gid4e777fa27a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.66.86.6 with SMTP id l6mr843292paz.11.1350015966581;
        Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!jt13ni5208pbb.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.supernews.com!news.supernews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:26:05 -0500
From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
Newsgroups: uk.tech.digital-tv,24hoursupport.helpdesk,uk.telecom.mobile,sci.electronics.basics,sci.electronics.repair
Subject: Re: Using mobile phone as an internet radio
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:26:03 -0700
Message-ID: <676f789p08ppt4l3eaios9qav4gplklgab@4ax.com>
References: <6qdr68d021n5f0juu8fldnn63rietbp30v@4ax.com> <de99517e-e5e1-4f9d-91e0-412ab3171a05@o8g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <VA.00000dad.004d8d90@escapetime.removethisbit.myzen.co.uk> <k4qf17$qv9$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx> <pdi478do5smmrom5434adftfr959ronmm7@4ax.com> <fece7656-e487-40a3-b50a-2bc763efdaf4@u19g2000yqo.googlegroups.com> <79gc785ot39fele33figctj1s7eg839d3t@4ax.com> <a6cd086d-6731-4426-b45c-1e0161a4e306@b8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
MIME-Version: 1.0
Lines: 71
X-Trace: sv3-VpYmXvH26gUiO/AJtp2scoCm8CRvglGOpbD5/BDoOw1sCrGyMCabnI/irrM9xLWEn0FkK5Jb5X38C0y!wJEkxewDJA3MDw8Bpab1zl4kE7MQ1oHRTnTOzBIGbocTqxlUXrSm2wUzYOBktjHRKJH3Oj3lYw7h!i8oV
X-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/abuse.html
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: www.supernews.com/docs/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4536
X-Original-Bytes: 4475
X-Received-Bytes: 4683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit