Article View: uk.tech.tv.sky
Article #8Re: Sky censorship - what they don't want their staff to read
From: Tiny Tim
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:26
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:26
46 lines
3239 bytes
3239 bytes
(message resequenced so that it can actually be read properly while retaining context) user1951@hotmail.com wrote: >> Their bat, their ball, their computer systems & internet bandwidth - >> they can decide what they want people to have access to on their >> systems during working hours. The facility to use their systems for >> purposes other than those directly related to work are a privelage >> not a right. Well said! > However it is still censorship from a news organisation. What does > that remind you of? > > They have selectively targeted a particular trade union website - in > the same way that they have kept quiet about the story of Coca Cola's > involvement in the assassination of union activists in > Colombia....another piece of selective targeting by a global > corporation. > > They print lies in their newspapers and deny anyone the right of > reply, they broadcast lies and they suppress the truth.....and you > think this does not matter? Personally I get pretty fed up with the "Nanny" mentality of using unions to fight workers' battles. If you don't like the job you're in then get another one. Take the firefighters as an example..... While their service is extremely worthy and exceptionally brave, they knew the risks and the rewards when they started the job. So why did they expect pay rises of 40% or so? I've given up work now but in the last few years my pay awards were only in the order of 2-3%, limited by commercial necessity, rather than due to my own performance. In fact the pay rises for 2002 were deferred by 3 months for several thousand staff due to difficult economic conditions. While the employees might have mumbled a bit we could all see the need and certainly didn't stamp our feet and threaten strike action. I'd say it's perfectly fair fo an employer to not wish its workers be distracted (in the employer's time) by information that might serve to undermine the company's operation and performance. p.s. if we stopped taking bloody asylum seakers then perhaps we could pay our firefighters a bit more!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bfoja3$h1n0b$1@ID-198854.news.uni-berlin.de>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!217.137.81.31!not-for-mailReferences:
<21180544.tKyIRmqmTn@4ax.com> <bGKTa.611$G85.586@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net> <03ivhv03hijp8h64iofkqq87hk45788gpb@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10d147,68e5a47b8ffbc985 X-Google-Attributes: gid10d147,public X-Google-Thread: 110850,68e5a47b8ffbc985 X-Google-Attributes: gid110850,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-24 05:26:45 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!217.137.81.31!not-for-mail From: "Tiny Tim" <t.dodd@virgin.net> Newsgroups: uk.tech.tv.sky,england.org.trade-union Subject: Re: Sky censorship - what they don't want their staff to read Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:26:41 +0100 Lines: 49 Message-ID: <bfoja3$h1n0b$1@ID-198854.news.uni-berlin.de> References: <21180544.tKyIRmqmTn@4ax.com> <bGKTa.611$G85.586@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net> <03ivhv03hijp8h64iofkqq87hk45788gpb@4ax.com> Reply-To: "Tiny Tim" <newsgroups@dodd99.freeserve.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: 217.137.81.31 X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1059049603 17882123 217.137.81.31 (16 [198854]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165