Article View: uk.telecom.mobile
Article #198Re: Cellphone Transmitter Safety [was NEW ZEALAND CELL-SITE LOCATIONS
From: Matthew McDonald
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 00:00
48 lines
2879 bytes
2879 bytes
jsw@isise.rl.ac.uk (John Wright) wrote: >On Thu, 28 Aug 1997 08:29:51 GMT, in <340a369c.1768073@news.sv.net.au>, >Matthew McDonald wrote: >>pteknik@djd.ftech.co.uk (Pyro Teknik) wrote: > >>>On flights you're told not to use mobile phones, and even at the airport >>>terminal your not *supposed* to use your phone. Depending on the air >>>company, you can't use CD Players, tape players, Laptops, Psions, and scanners. > >>It's to stop interference with sensitive navigation equipment AND to make >>people use the Airlines AirPhone at $$$$$ a minute. >> >>Another reason is to stop you annoying other people on the plane. >> >>It IS NOT related to the base stations on the ground getting confused. > >Then why is the use of mobile phones banned in light aircraft and >gliders, which may not have any radio at all, and no one else to >annoy... ???? No idea, but it may still be related to the instruments. Also it may distract the pilot. Think about the base station scenario for a minute. Each base station covers approx 35km's, in the city there are a lot more, when you're flying at say 350km's a hour, you'll log onto a new base station ever 7 seven minutes or so. In the city driving around you log onto a new base more often. A lot of people have said it confused the base stations, but I seem to remember that base stations (gsm) can transfer calls at high speed (700kays plus?). Maybe on older phones it was a problem but I cannot see this as the problem. Regards Matthew -- ______________________________________________________________ Matthew McDonald GPO Box 2427, Brisbane, Qld 4001 Add matthew to the email address to respond. GSMonline GSM Page: http://www.starvision.net/gsm/ PiazzaWORLD: http://www.starvision.net/matthew/piazza/ Home of the GSM FAQ and Isuzu FAQ ____________________________
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<341166c3.14096667@news.sv.net.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<33EF40CB.6E22@sympatico.ca> <33f1040a.532021@news.btinternet.com> <33f1ef15.253725213@news.demon.co.uk> <33f43b2f.0@194.176.131.18> <33FC0F31.794BDF32@nospam.guildford.ericsson.se> <33fc3a6d.0@194.176.131.18> <01bcae7c$a3becee0$0a950ccb@default> <340498eb.8130213@news.sv.net.au> <rIj$FTAmQBA0UwcZ@candyman.demon.co.uk> <34021737.35807046@news.sv.net.au> <slrn602lkm.1q4.pteknik@djd.ftech.co.uk> <340a369c.1768073@news.sv.net.au> <5u3kji$16c2@newton.cc.rl.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fc9bd,1d9a09d5c7e552ed X-Google-Attributes: gidfc9bd,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,1911de612f06767f X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public From: firstnamehere@sv.net.au (Matthew McDonald) Subject: Re: Cellphone Transmitter Safety [was NEW ZEALAND CELL-SITE LOCATIONS Date: 1997/08/28 Message-ID: <341166c3.14096667@news.sv.net.au> X-Deja-AN: 268742344 References: <33EF40CB.6E22@sympatico.ca> <33f1040a.532021@news.btinternet.com> <33f1ef15.253725213@news.demon.co.uk> <33f43b2f.0@194.176.131.18> <33FC0F31.794BDF32@nospam.guildford.ericsson.se> <33fc3a6d.0@194.176.131.18> <01bcae7c$a3becee0$0a950ccb@default> <340498eb.8130213@news.sv.net.au> <rIj$FTAmQBA0UwcZ@candyman.demon.co.uk> <34021737.35807046@news.sv.net.au> <slrn602lkm.1q4.pteknik@djd.ftech.co.uk> <340a369c.1768073@news.sv.net.au> <5u3kji$16c2@newton.cc.rl.ac.uk> Organization: GSMonline Reply-To: firstnamehere@sv.net.au Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile,aus.comms