Article View: uk.telecom.mobile
Article #319Re: Mobile Number Portability (MNP)
From: Robert Bozinovski
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 00:00
233 lines
11509 bytes
11509 bytes
On Fri, 09 Apr 1999 16:34:39 +0930, David Klemitz <es00749@ozemail.com.au> wrote: >Here in Australia the government is in the process of mandating this in >the local and mobile markets. Does anybody have and sources of >information (internet or otherwise) which highlight what the current >issues are? Also I'm interested in hearing about the experiences both >from a customer point of view as well as the success or otherwise of the >Signalling Relay Scheme in the mobile market. Advanced Search Advertise on CWI Online Europe waits as U.K. mobiles get portable numbers By Jeremy Scott-Joynt 18 January 1999 Britain's experiment with number portability for mobile phones is under scrutiny by the rest of the world, as the United Kingdom's service providers and mobile users grapple with the commercial implications of the new regime. Elsewhere in Europe plans to follow the same path have been hit by delays: Deadlines in Germany, the Netherlands and Austria have slipped, with operators citing administrative and technical problems. From 1 January, U.K. users who have been with their mobile provider for longer than their initial sign-up period (usually one year) have been able to switch to another mobile network and take their existing mobile number with them. "Regulators will be looking at the U.K. and asking, 'What happened there?'" said Graham Oxby, director of marketing for Cable & Wireless Global Mobile. "Once the U.K. has sorted it out, it will seem easier for everyone else." As a result of the change analysts say business users will be able to rethink their mobile strategies, while operators are already reworking the way that they recruit and retain customers. Already one network has set about making payments to users that switch to them. "Corporate accounts are the most desirable, not least because once they're in, they're often locked in," said Deborah Monas, an analyst at London consultancy Kagan World Media Inc. "Number portability could therefore give corporate telecoms managers a lot more bargaining power," she added. And the existing emphasis on not just price but also quality of service would be sharpened, said Monas. "Customers are going to find it much easier to demand intelligent network services like integrated messaging, not to mention quality of service guarantees." Michael Dixon, head of the Leatherhead, England-based Telecommunications Managers Association's numbering group, said number portability's main effect would be to give telecoms managers, whose policies regarding mobiles have tended to date to be less mature than their wireline policies, more options. "If historically - for whatever reason - you happen to have had your staff mobiles spread across two or three operators, you can take the opportunity to tidy them all up into one," he said, adding that perhaps the majority of corporations found themselves in such a position. That would give telecoms managers extra leverage in negotiating with the networks to settle on a single one. Conversely, he said, some managers feel more comfortable spreading their business across a number of networks: "It makes them feel that they're covered in case anything goes wrong." And for these managers, number portability makes the spread easier to achieve. Massey, one of BT-owned Cellnet's number portability project team, acknowledged that by making the switch from one network to another less traumatic, number portability will reduce resistance to such a move from those within corporations who actually use the phones, potentially raising churn rates. Cellnet, he said, is trying to retain users, both corporate and individual, through expanded loyalty program - a tactic he expected other operators to follow. For corporate customers, Cellnet introduced Business First in November last year to reward those who committed to a one-to-five year contract. The rewards include flat-rate tariffs across the board, with discounts depending on the length of contract and the volume of calls, rising to a maximum of 27% for a spend of �10,000 ($16,400) per month or more on a five-year contract. For individual customers, the company introduced its First Cellnet program in July last year, "consciously ahead of number portability," which also rewards customers agreeing to stay with the network with tariff discounts. "Of 4 million users, 1 million have signed up and 80% of them have agreed to longer contracts," said Cellnet's Massey. Cellnet's churn during the six-month period covered by First, he said, had declined from 31.5% to 28.5% compared with the previous year. Another effect - albeit one that impacts on the U.K. market more than some others - could be a reduction of the high handset subsidies. According to Parantha Narendra, a mobile market consultant with London-based Ovum Ltd., the most likely personal customers to switch will be the highly sought-after high-spending users. "It takes 18 months to recoup the cost of a new subscriber, and if the most valuable customers can move, extra pressure will be put on handset subsidies," he said. "The networks privately say they wish they hadn't taken that route, and they'd love to lose it." Anna Cloake, director of communications at Borehamwood, England-based mobile operator One 2 One, admitted that in the long term a rebalancing of the high subsidies/high tariff structure is possible. But, she pointed out, subsidies were already dropping - not because customers are paying more, but because manufacturers are charging less. "It's down to �100 to �200 now," she said. In response to number portability, One 2 One is enticing individuals with a transfer fee of �25 to �100, depending on which tariff package they choose. Similarly, discounts and incentives would be offered to corporate users, to be negotiated on a case-by-case basis. Europe still waiting Elsewhere in Europe mobile users are still waiting for portability. In Germany, the regulator, the Regulierungsbehorde, initially set 1 January 2000 as the start date for both mobile and wireline number portability. "The principle that you can port your number is important," said Hugen Tobler, a spokesman for the regulator. But, he added, the networks' insistence that their billing and switching systems needed more time to adapt meant that "in practice I fear it won't happen" until much later in the year. The Netherlands, according to Mohamed Nasroullah, head of numbering and security for the Directorate General of Posts and Telecoms, had aimed to start number portability on the same day as the United Kingdom. "It is a license obligation," he said. "But the administrative difficulties, and the problems of adapting the networks, means that availability is delayed until 1 April." For Austrian users, the expected start date of 1 January 2000 looks set for at least a year's delay following upheaval at Telekom Austria. "We agreed the date with all the operators," said one senior official in the Ministry of Public Planning and Transport, "but then Telekom Austria changed their mind." France, Spain, Italy have no plans to introduce mobile number portability. Information : info@total.emap.com URL : http://www.totaltele.com � EMAP Media 1999 >One specific question is , in the UK can you port any mobile number or >is there a specific number range that customers have to buy into ? Mobile Number Portability Fallout Leads to Tariff Confusion By Vanessa Clark 07 April 1999 Three months after the implementation of mobile number portability (MNP) in the U.K., the first cracks are beginning to show with the emergence of a convoluted and confusing tariffing situation. The problem doesn't affect mobile subcribers themselves, but rather those calling their phones from a fixed line. The cost of calling each of the U.K.'s four cellular networks varies considerably. So what happens when a subscriber to one cellular network moves to another and takes their number with them? Does a phone call to the subscriber get charged at the old network's rate, or the new one? Answer: The old one.The number maybe mobile but the incoming tariff isn't. Which means that there is little incentive for mobile operators to compete for customers on the basis of the cost of incoming calls. A spokesman for the U.K. regulator, the Office of Telecommunications, admitted the situation was "not ideal", but said that it was a by-product of the way that MNP had been implemented in the U.K. Using a process known as 'tromboning', calls from a BT line to a ported number first go to the original mobile operator that had the number assigned to it. If this network recognizes that the number has been ported it redirects the call towards the new operator's network. This is the "simplest, cheapest and fastest way," of implementing MNP said the Oftel spokesman, who claimed the U.K. is the first country in the world to implement MNP. Oftel figures show that currently more users are porting from Vodafone and Cellnet to Orange and One2One - One2One claim to be gaining five customers for every one lost - so this situation actually benefits callers as under the new calling rates, to take effect at the end of the month, it will be cheaper to phone Vodafone and Cellnet than One2One or Orange. BT and the two bigger mobile operators, Vodafone and Cellnet, reviewed these prices in response to to a demand from the U.K. antitrust body, the Mergers and Monopolies Commission. But Orange and One2One did not reduce the amount they charge for receiving calls, to Oftel's surprize: "We expected Orange and One2One to reduce costs in line with BT," admitted an Oftel spokesman. It's "an awful mess," according to Steve Thorpe, membership services manager of the U.K.'s Telecommunications Users Association (TUA). "It's a maze," he said, " and someone has to get to the bottom of this." The TUA's preferred solution would be the emergence of a flat rate for calls to all the mobile networks. "It's smoke-filled rooms time" for Oftel, said Richard Cox, principal at Mandarin Technologies. "They have to hammer out something." Robert Bozinovski GSM: +61 411 119 555 Fax: +61 2 9512 2888 GPO Box 1702, Sydney NSW 1043, Australia www.poboxes.com/nuuuuuude
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<370dc2e3.2177327@news.optusnet.com.au>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<370DA686.DF35299D@ozemail.com.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 114575,3dae8f9e8e03972d X-Google-Attributes: gid114575,public X-Google-Thread: 10db0e,3dae8f9e8e03972d X-Google-Attributes: gid10db0e,public X-Google-Thread: fb718,3dae8f9e8e03972d X-Google-Attributes: gidfb718,public X-Google-Thread: f461e,3dae8f9e8e03972d X-Google-Attributes: gidf461e,public X-Google-Thread: 15eacb,3dae8f9e8e03972d X-Google-Attributes: gid15eacb,public From: mobile@poboxes.com (Robert Bozinovski) Subject: Re: Mobile Number Portability (MNP) Date: 1999/04/09 Message-ID: <370dc2e3.2177327@news.optusnet.com.au> X-Deja-AN: 464369306 References: <370DA686.DF35299D@ozemail.com.au> X-Complaints-To: abuse@mpx.com.au X-Trace: news1.mpx.com.au 923648754 6440 198.142.204.35 (9 Apr 1999 09:05:54 GMT) Organization: Sometimes Reply-To: mobile@poboxes.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Apr 1999 09:05:54 GMT Newsgroups: uk.telecom.mobile,alt.cellular.gsm,aus.comms.mobile,alt.cellular.phone-technology,uk.telecom