🚀 go-pugleaf

"David Wood" <david@wood2.org.uk> wrote in message
news:C8x$eGICYNg9EAui@wood2.org.uk
> [Note the cross-posting - I've not specified a follow up, but leave to
> future posters to decide which group or groups are more relevant]

> Turnpike allows you to switch freely between posting a follow up and
> emailing a reply, even when you're writing. That is one of the
> requirements of the Good Net-Keeping Seal of Approval - see
> <http://www.gnksa.org> and note that Turnpike Six has the seal of
> approval.


Posted and Mailed  - for obvious reasons, and not in one go, and not to
David either :-)

Hi Jeroen

Please ignore what I'm posting with :-)

I was looking up the GNKSA evaluation for Turnpike, and I see that Turnpike
6.01 (not 6.0.1 as you have on the site) achieved a 93% rating.

I notice that products in the Failed lists which go to a later version are
re-sequenced according to that later version's improved % score on MUSTs.

But TP 6.01 has not bubbled to its rightful place of fourth in the Passed
list for MS-DOS, etc, because its placing seems to be still determined by
Turnpike 5.01,  with its 67% rating.

Would you consider resequencing the Passed lists when the SHOULDs improve,
as you do the Failed lists when the MUSTs improve?

That would elevate Turnpike to nearer its rightful place (and by the same
standard, slrn would also go up one place in the Unix 'Passed' list).

Thanks

-- 
Roy Brown

Posting with the OEnemy, tamed by OE-QuoteFix 1.17.6
http://jump.to/oe-quotefix