Article View: uk.transport
Article #116Re: City Traffic
From: TREHARAJ
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:52
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 17:52
34 lines
1520 bytes
1520 bytes
============================================================================== :Bob Hendley writes: :>=============================================================================== :> :>In article <1993Jan22.143422.23243@gssec.bt.co.uk> amatthew@gssec.bt.co.uk (Alan Matthews) writes :> :>>Try taking into account the cost to an individual (over a year) of: :>> :> :>[some deleted] :> :>> :>>and also the less quantifiable costs which everyone contributes to: :>> :>>cost of road repairs caused by every extra car on the road :>>cost of new roads / road widening needed due to the extra cars on the road :>>cost of pollution :>> :>>On that basis, public transport is cheaper not only for individuals but for :>>society as a whole. :>> :> :>This would appear to assume that buses (in particular) cause less :>damage to roads, require less road space and cause less pollution than :>cars. :> :>The first is clearly untrue. <deleted> :> :> Why? One bus will cause more damage than one car, but the arguement is not for us all to go and buy a bus, it's that we should share the use of one. One bus vs. several cars? Clearly preferable. Andy T.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<935225175215@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!bham!ibm3090.bham.ac.uk!TREHARAJShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!bham!ibm3090.bham.ac.uk!TREHARAJ From: TREHARAJ@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk Newsgroups: uk.transport Subject: Re: City Traffic Date: 25 Jan 93 17:52:15 GMT Organization: The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom Lines: 34 Message-ID: <935225175215@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: ibm3090.bham.ac.uk