Article View: uk.transport
Article #160Re: Small Gods Annotations
From: Clive Feather
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:49
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:49
43 lines
2691 bytes
2691 bytes
In article <1993Jan27.104508.24667@infodev.cam.ac.uk> rf@cl.cam.ac.uk (Robin Fairbairns) writes: > The serious issue about the ultra-light weight cross-country trains is > nothing to do with leaves. Because they are so light, they have a > tendency only intermittently to operate track circuits that detect the > presence of trains on a portion of track. This is a misunderstanding of the situation. The problem is not with all ultra-light-weight trains - indeed, it does not happen at all with the "bus bodies on rail wheels" abominations. The problem is actually rather different. When a rail is left unused for a day or so, it gains a thin layer of oxide, which is an insulator. Normally this isn't a problem, because the front wheels of the train hunt from side to side across the rail as the train progresses, scraping the oxide off, and the remaining axles operate the track circuits quite happily. The problem with the class 156 trains was that the design was so *good* that the wheels don't hunt on straight track - instead, all the wheels follow exactly the same path on the rail [1], and the oxide never gets removed. The solution is to add "active shunts" which send a burst of electricity through the rails, breaking down the oxide. [1] Skeptics should note that the BR standard ride-quality test is to stand a pound coin on the floor of the train. > BR's reprehensible attitude to R&D again, I'm afraid. If only they'ld > spent more money, they'ld have anticipated the problem before they > installed the current generation of track circuits, and made them > behave more reliably in today's conditions. The track-circuit problem only occurs when the line is used *only* by the particular kind of train. This is quite a hard situation to test for. Anyway, BR aren't allowed to spend their own money on such things (*all* expenditure on new stock has to be approved by the DoT, *even* if they are spending extra income rather than PSO money). -- Clive D.W. Feather | IXI Limited | If you lie to the compiler, clive@x.co.uk | Vision Park | it will get its revenge. Phone: +44 223 236 555 | Cambridge CB4 4RZ | - Henry Spencer Fax: +44 223 236 550 | United Kingdom |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<C1KE9r.AnM@x.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!fulcrum!warwick!pipex!hunts.x.co.uk!cliveReferences:
<728033204snx@warren.demon.co.uk> <1993Jan26.144244.10642@bradford.ac.uk> <1993Jan27.104508.24667@infodev.cam.ac.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: uk.transport,rec.railroad Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!inmos!fulcrum!warwick!pipex!hunts.x.co.uk!clive From: clive@x.co.uk (Clive Feather) Subject: Re: Small Gods Annotations Message-ID: <C1KE9r.AnM@x.co.uk> Organization: IXI Limited References: <728033204snx@warren.demon.co.uk> <1993Jan26.144244.10642@bradford.ac.uk> <1993Jan27.104508.24667@infodev.cam.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 12:49:02 GMT Lines: 43