Thread View: uk.transport
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by Judith M Smith
Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:08
uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: Judith M Smith
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:08
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:08
39 lines
3147 bytes
3147 bytes
Ian Jackson's system "chiark" is supposed to be running uk.rec.cycling.moderated, yet he is consistently discarding emails to the moderation address and claiming that it is the fault of Microsoft (sorry, should that be M$). I do not profess to be an expert, but this sounds extremely unlikely. No doubt when anybody posts opinions that he or Chapman do not like, they can delete it and claim they did not even see the post for moderation because it came from "M$" - no censorship here mate. When asked of he planned to mend his system (if he wasn't deleting emails deliberately - a big if), he freely admitted that he would not >> what you are going to do about this for the future. >The answer is, of course, nothing. He has been pathetic and small-minded over this whole issue. His system uses the University of Cambridge computing facilities as some sort of access node. I wonder how they would feel about their systems being used as part of Jackson and Chapman's lies. As I said - he has already shown that he can read messages from Microsoft systems when he chooses to, when he was called out in public over email sent to him. He is almost as despicable as Chapman. I urge people to consider the question when the call for votes for urcm: Is Ian Jackson capable of running any system fairly and honestly? -- Someone calling himself Lou Knee made a post in urc referring to another poster as "a piece of shit". The post was made from an IP address which had been used in urc over the last 6 years uniquely by Guy Chapman. All available evidence points to Lou Knee being a nym shift of Guy Chapman. A respected poster to URC, JNugent, has categorically asked Guy Chapman if he has ever posted using the name Lou Knee. Guy Chapman has refused to answer this question. Conclusion: Guy Chapman and Lou Knee are one and the same despicable person.
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: The Older Gentleman
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:09
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:09
12 lines
1274 bytes
1274 bytes
Judith M Smith <judithmsmith@live.co.uk> wrote: <Snip> Do sod off, you sad, sad little person. -- BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Honda CB400F Triumph Street Triple Suzuki TS250ER Coo, down to just five bikes! If you don't know what you're doing, don't do it. And RTFM. chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: A.Lee
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:12
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:12
12 lines
1577 bytes
1577 bytes
Judith M Smith <judithmsmith@live.co.uk> wrote: ... > I urge people to consider the question when the call for votes for > urcm: Is Ian Jackson capable of running any system fairly and honestly? It will never be 'fair and honest' for you and your ilk you thick twat. The moderated group will be there to get rid of idiots like you, and good riddance too. Alan. -- To reply by e-mail, change the ' + ' to 'plus'.
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: Grimly Curmudgeon
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:34
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:34
12 lines
1707 bytes
1707 bytes
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember Judith M Smith <judithmsmith@live.co.uk> saying something like: >Ian Jackson's system "chiark" is supposed to be running >uk.rec.cycling.moderated, Shove it up your Brembo. This post brought to you by Slouching Driver Midden Wagon.
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: TimB
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:32
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:32
41 lines
3414 bytes
3414 bytes
On Jul 9, 1:08 am, Judith M Smith <judithmsm...@live.co.uk> wrote: > Ian Jackson's system "chiark" is supposed to be running > uk.rec.cycling.moderated, yet he is consistently discarding emails to > the moderation address and claiming that it is the fault of Microsoft > (sorry, should that be M$). > I do not profess to be an expert, but this sounds extremely unlikely. > > No doubt when anybody posts opinions that he or Chapman do not like, > they can delete it and claim they did not even see the post for > moderation because it came from "M$" - no censorship here mate. > > When asked of he planned to mend his system (if he wasn't deleting > emails deliberately - a big if), he freely admitted that he would not > > >> what you are going to do about this for the future. > >The answer is, of course, nothing. > > He has been pathetic and small-minded over this whole issue. > > His system uses the University of Cambridge computing facilities as > some sort of access node. I wonder how they would feel about their > systems being used as part of Jackson and Chapman's lies. > > As I said - he has already shown that he can read messages from > Microsoft systems when he chooses to, when he was called out in public > over email sent to him. He is almost as despicable as Chapman. > > I urge people to consider the question when the call for votes for > urcm: Is Ian Jackson capable of running any system fairly and honestly? > > -- > Someone calling himself Lou Knee made a post in urc > referring to another poster as "a piece of shit". > The post was made from an IP address which had been used in urc over the last 6 years > uniquely by Guy Chapman. > All available evidence points to Lou Knee being a nym shift of Guy Chapman. > A respected poster to URC, JNugent, has categorically asked Guy Chapman if he has ever posted using the name Lou Knee. > Guy Chapman has refused to answer this question. > Conclusion: Guy Chapman and Lou Knee are one and the same despicable person. Isn't that the point of moderation? to exclude morons like you?
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: Grimly Curmudgeon
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:25
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:25
12 lines
2009 bytes
2009 bytes
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember TimB <timburford@onetel.net> saying something like: >> Conclusion: Guy Chapman and Lou Knee are one and the same despicable person. > >Isn't that the point of moderation? to exclude morons like you? Honestly, I think the point has been made by the x-posting to ukrm and anyone who gives a shit knows about it by now. I see this has also dropped ukrc, so it's just a trolling exercise now.
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: jms
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:58
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:58
22 lines
1741 bytes
1741 bytes
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 00:08:32 +0000 (UTC), Judith M Smith <judithmsmith@live.co.uk> wrote: >Ian Jackson's system "chiark" is supposed to be running >uk.rec.cycling.moderated, yet he is consistently discarding emails to >the moderation address and claiming that it is the fault of Microsoft >(sorry, should that be M$). >I do not profess to be an expert, but this sounds extremely unlikely. The post above was not made by me. Check the headers - and you will see that this is the case. I can only think of one person who would be twisted enough to make it. -- Vote NO to the proposed group uk.rec.cycling.moderated aka uk.rec.cycling.censored
Re: uk.rec.cycling.moderated and urcm-moderators@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Author: Grimly Curmudgeon
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:33
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:33
9 lines
1718 bytes
1718 bytes
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember jms <moderation2009@live.co.uk> saying something like: >The post above was not made by me. We don't give a fuck. Will you keep your petty squabbles on the other side of the fence, please.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads