Thread View: uk.transport
8 messages
8 total messages
Started by David Smith
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:25
DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: David Smith
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:25
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:25
78 lines
4837 bytes
4837 bytes
DESTROYING ENGLAND England is under siege. Our country is being systematically destroyed to provide housing, roads, airport extentions, and other amenities, for a population deluge that is fuelled by out-of-control immigration. The South East of England will be worst effected. The government is failing to build sufficient infrastructure to cope with the growth population. The present overwhelming flood of immigration is set to become an explosion after 1 May 2004, when 10 countries, including Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, are set to join the EU: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3471769.stm More people means more building and less space: less England. The East of England Regional Assembly, an unelected body, has already approved plans by housing minister Lord Rooker to build around 20,000 new houses in the so-called "London-Stanstead-Cambridge growth area. The unelected EERA has already accepted government plans to build 72,000 houses in Hertfordshire alone! The unelected EERA is seeking Green Belt or "green field" sites where a proportion of the homes will be built, by 2021. "England's green and pleasant land" is being systematically abolished. And so are the rights of British Nationals. British pensioners are freezing to death in poverty in their homes, while immigrants living on benefits are handed free cars and houses and going on expensive holidays, all paid for by the British taxpayer. Does charity not begin at home? Some migrants are genuinely seeking asylum from genuine persecution. But do other, nearer European countries not offer safe asylum? Asylum seekers usually pass straight through several perfectly safe European countries, including France, before arriving on our shores. Our taxes just keep rising to pay for them. Apparently, neglecting British Nationals while pampering foreign illegal migrants is political correctness. It seems more like dangerous madness. I am far from "right wing" and I am certainly no extremist. My mother was Jewish. I opposed the illegal war against Iraq, which was more about oil and Israel than terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. I have voted for a variety of political parties in the past, from the Green Party and the Liberal Democrats, to the Conservatives (anything to get BLiar out!) The government is trying to downplay the problems associated with the immigration-fuelled population explosion; perhaps because they are afraid of pushing people to too far towards the right of the political spectrum. But their failure to address the crisis is doing just that. Britain is becoming overcrowded and increasingly unpleasant. Immigration is ruining our country and many people, like me, still love this country, (although patriotism apparently makes you a Nazi in Britain.) Only the far-right seems prepared to take a what is only a common-sense, self-preservation attitude to the immigration timebomb. What are we to do? Should we stand shoulder-to-shoulder at our borders and carry out immigration control ourselves? Should we take direct eco-terrorist-style action against the building projects that are killing our local communities? Many reasonable, tolerant people today feel forced to consider voting for far-right political parties like the BNP in order to save their region and their country. We cannot stop extremism while it seems to offer the only available solutions to the real problems of real people. Tackling immigration does not make you a Nazi. It does not mean that you advocate genocide. It does not promote hatred. If we are to combat extremism then we must first address the problems that foster it. Our quality of life, our local community, and our nation itself is under threat. And desperate times call for desperate measures.
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: Alan O'Brien
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:22
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:22
4 lines
1545 bytes
1545 bytes
I know you won't read or reply to this - but I strongly advise you not to worry about it. There has been innigration in the past and there will be in the future - so what?
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: Cast_Iron
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:26
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:26
11 lines
1917 bytes
1917 bytes
"David Smith" <davidsmith@modoracle.com> wrote in message news:1dc47522.0402120725.79bae1e0@posting.google.com... > DESTROYING ENGLAND > > England is under siege. Our country is being systematically destroyed > to provide housing, roads, airport extentions, and other amenities, > for a population deluge that is fuelled by out-of-control immigration. The whole country is populated by immigrants or descendents of immigrants as is every other country in the world. Learn to live with it.
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: Depresion
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:17
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:17
12 lines
1960 bytes
1960 bytes
"David Smith" <davidsmith@modoracle.com> wrote in message news:1dc47522.0402120725.79bae1e0@posting.google.com... > DESTROYING ENGLAND > > England is under siege. Our country is being systematically destroyed > to provide housing, roads, airport extentions, and other amenities, > for a population deluge that is fuelled by out-of-control immigration. Put down the Sun and step away from the Times. Think of this illegal immigration funds organised crime, what we need is not tighter immigration laws but laxer regulations.
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: jamjar
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:23
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:23
10 lines
1803 bytes
1803 bytes
David Smith wrote: > British pensioners are freezing to death in poverty in their homes, > while immigrants living on benefits are handed free cars and houses > and going on expensive holidays, all paid for by the British taxpayer. > Does charity not begin at home? Oh PLEASE. I suppose it's USENET so we're going to get some weirdos, but what a load of puffed up vitriol this truly is. I would debate this but is uk.rec.transport not uk.politics.bigoted.
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: Nathaniel Porter
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:43
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:43
3 lines
1445 bytes
1445 bytes
Wow! Someone who entirely fits the term"eco-Nazi"! <plonk!>
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: Aidan Stanger
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:12
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:12
24 lines
2179 bytes
2179 bytes
Depresion <blank@128.0.0.1> wrote: > "David Smith" <davidsmith@modoracle.com> wrote: > > DESTROYING ENGLAND > > > > England is under siege. Our country is being systematically destroyed > > to provide housing, roads, airport extentions, and other amenities, > > for a population deluge that is fuelled by out-of-control immigration. If you're still reading this (which I very much doubt) ITYF this is more to do with government policy than population. And I suggest you look at the enormous amount of green space around before you start claiming "systematic destruction". > > Put down the Sun and step away from the Times. That comments the reason I bothered replying. Last year The Sun seemed to have a far more sensible attitude to immigration. Has it changed? > Think of this illegal immigration funds organised crime, what we need is > not tighter immigration laws but laxer regulations. The solution is better enforcement of existing laws, easier legal immigration, and perhaps most importantly, making it self funding.
Re: DESTROYING ENGLAND
Author: Corky
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:47
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:47
5 lines
1227 bytes
1227 bytes
davidsmith@modoracle.com (David Smith) wrote in message news:<1dc47522.0402120725.79bae1e0@posting.google.com>... > DESTROYING ENGLAND > <snip> Do you read the Daily Mail by any chance?
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads