🚀 go-pugleaf

Aratzio wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:41:51 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
> <dhunt@celticommnospam.com> got double secret probation because:
> 
>>
>>"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message 
>>news:vpfhf21db77fi9aknc6trlv1b75t1hr0rp@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:57:04 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
>>> <dhunt@celticommnospam.com> got double secret probation because:
>>>>
>>>>Ah, and exactly how does one save anyother from themselves?
>>>
>>> By education, which appears, in this case to have an exceedingly small
>>> chance of success.
>>
>>The only thing your bunch can do (and it's already done in USdotSplat) is to 
>>teach anyone how to Group Mission Troll and Post.  Guess it must be your 
>>shift.  Sorry, the 404thk00ks are better at this routine.
> 
> So you still do not get the idea of post & response. Well, that does
> prove my point that the chances were exceedingly small at the outset.
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> I wouldn't even
>>>>venture to attempt to save you from yourself.  It just can't be done.  To
>>>>think it can is quite k00kish.
>>>
>>> Which is why you are a moron.
>>
>>Ah, you are still in denial.  
> 
> We tell Ah that all the time he just denies it.

I do not!

> 
>>Guess that must be a river in Egypt, k00k.
> 
> Wow, such an original falme. You are just a font of material stolen
> from the local grade school.
> 
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> <notes whole "great movie" reference flew over kookoo's nest>
>>>>
>>>>Now you believe movies are real life.  Very good.  Please check yourself 
>>>>in.
>>>
>>> So you think using a metaphorical situation in a movie as a
>>> referential in a usenet post makes it possible for you to determine
>>> that someone believes movies to be real?
>>
>>LOL, try to keep up.
> 
> Why didn't you just say "Huh?", moron? 
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>> My gawd, he's as stupid as Stoopid.
>>>
>>> <Notes: Duhryle still ain't got the reference>
>>
>>Junior, I ignore mostly what you post.  To do otherwise would be k00kish and 
>>you have that cornered already.
> 
> Translation:
> "Jes Trollin Guv"
> 
> You would have looked less foolish had you just wrote "Huh?"
> 
> 
>>>>Then you deny that you are a k00k.  Of course, the first sign of a real 
>>>>k00k
>>>>is their denial.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Where did I deny or agree with anything, Duhryl?
>>>
>>> BTW, Duh, it's the delusions that give the kooks away first.
>>
>>Delusion would be to believe that I will surrender.
> 
> No, that would be that I want you to surrender. You are to be toyed
> with, abused and left laying about until some new denizen of AUK
> decides to play "slap the DUH into Duhryle".
> 
>>  USdotSplat knows that will NEVER happen. 
> 
> Reference a dear hierarchy to support your own delusions.
> 
>> Now, when you are k00king at me you are out of 
>>circulation for others.  So let's keep this going.  It's entertaining.
>>
> 
> You are either too stupid to see how over matched you are in every
> usenet discussion with every usenet poster you engage or you are a
> masochist. Since you believe yourself to be entertained by being made
> a fool by so many people I will have to go with the latter.
> 
> 
>>>>Just stated fact, twinkie breath.
>>>
>>> "IT'S A KORNSPIRACY! I FINGERED IT OUT!"
>>> You mean that "fact"
>>> Please see comment about delusions above, Duh.
>>
>>REmember, you are the one claiming that I am claiming a conspiracy.  Sounds 
>>like you are quite delusional and k00kish to me.
>>
> 
> Duh, you do know what the word "conspiracy" means, right? 
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Of course, databasix has more than it's fair share of k00ks running around 
>>>>on it.
>>>
>>> "Databasix is the EVUL EMPIRE, I FEAR IT"
>>
>>LOL, in the grand scale of Empires on the Usenets, Databasix is more akin to 
>>a bunch of cub scouts.
>>
> 
> Which makes your little hobby server, the Brownies.
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>But a conspiracy?  Only your
>>>>conspiracy theory is a conspiracy in itself and quite k00kish at that.
>>>
>>> And I quote:
>>> "It appears that we found the link between these two."
>>> Shall *we* look at that one sentence, Duh?
>>> 1. Use of the word *we* to indicate that there is more than one person
>>> *investigating*.
>>> 2. "the link" which means you were looking for a Kornspiracy.
>>> 3. "these two" and there it is, the Kornspirators.
>>
>>Actually, there is a link.  Without Kevin there would be no Databasix for 
>>Gary to play with.
> 
> And just what link would that be, DUH? Cmon make your case that there
> is a *link*. 
> 
> <taps foot>
> 
> 
> 
>>> Anything else you need explained about what you write, I am here to
>>> help, Duh.
>>
> 
> <Duh, failing to note the direct responses typed already>
>>Try typing and staying focused.
> 
> Do you do any other stupid, semi-coherent, marginally human tricks,
> Duh?
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>But, of course, you will never admit to being a k00k. But a k00k would 
>>>>never
>>>>admit to being a k00k.  It's quite a circle, there, Sigmund
>>>
>>> "It is my delusion and I am going to keep beating it until everyone
>>> else agrees with my delusion"
>>>
>>> You are a moron.
>>
> 
> <Duh, after the amazing feat of reading, retypes previous statement,
> then proves the point>
>>Is that your new catch phrase?  Guess you ran out of things to say.  Typical 
>>of a k00k.
> 
> This boy may be the equal of Bullis.

5.7 6.1 8.3 6.3 6.7
-- 
ah