🚀 go-pugleaf

Art Deco wrote:
> ah <splifingate@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> AUK Registrar <cjiii@mxyzptlk.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>In <310820062028561026%erfc@netcabal.com>, Art Deco <erfc@netcabal.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Daryl Hunt <dhunt@celticommnospam.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>><theguyonthebike@veryfast.biz> wrote in message 
>>>>>>news:1157060076.502838.221760@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> K. A. Cannon wrote:
>>>>>>>> Due to the silly discussion currently taking place in us.config in
>>>>>>>> regards to us.military.army I would like to know if moderation has a
>>>>>>>> place in us.*.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Certainly since the new fiasco in Iraq us.military.army has become
>>>>>>>> almost unusable to the average user. What used to be a moderate
>>>>>>>> traffic group now has hundreds of crossposted articles each week.
>>>>>>>> A good percentage of the crossposted articles are not appropriate for
>>>>>>>> us.military.army.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am well aware of the technical aspects involved in moderation of a
>>>>>>>> newsgroup but am uncertain if the hierarchy manager due to her lack of
>>>>>>>> technical expertise using command line utilities and Unix systems.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does moderation have a place in us.*?
>>>>>>>> Individual moderators, moderations teams, moderation committee?
>>>>>>>> Bandwidth considerations: from where? who maintains it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think us.military.army.moderated might be a viable alterative.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a coward, Cannon...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, he should be voted in as COTM. Notice how one can't handle a person
>>>>>>and 
>>>>>>here comes the rest from AUK?  Not to worry, they are way over their
>>>>>>heads. 
>>>>>>Join us in alt.usenet.kooks and we can vote on what AUKk00k should get the 
>>>>>>new awards.  Cannon would be the next AUKk00k COTM.  Since they like to 
>>>>>>invade us, let's invade them.
>>>>>
>>>>>Chucknozzle, yuk -- is there any kook you won't slurp along the
>>>>>roadside as part of your crusade, Duhryl?
>>>>
>>>>Short answer:  No
>>>>
>>>>Long answer:  HELL no.
>>> 
>>> Yup.
>>
>>Yup.
> 
> Yup.

Yup.
-- 
ah