🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 17:41:51 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
<dhunt@celticommnospam.com> got double secret probation because:

>
>"Aratzio" <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote in message 
>news:vpfhf21db77fi9aknc6trlv1b75t1hr0rp@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 16:57:04 -0600, "Daryl Hunt"
>> <dhunt@celticommnospam.com> got double secret probation because:
>>>
>>>Ah, and exactly how does one save anyother from themselves?
>>
>> By education, which appears, in this case to have an exceedingly small
>> chance of success.
>
>The only thing your bunch can do (and it's already done in USdotSplat) is to 
>teach anyone how to Group Mission Troll and Post.  Guess it must be your 
>shift.  Sorry, the 404thk00ks are better at this routine.

So you still do not get the idea of post & response. Well, that does
prove my point that the chances were exceedingly small at the outset.

>
>
>>
>>> I wouldn't even
>>>venture to attempt to save you from yourself.  It just can't be done.  To
>>>think it can is quite k00kish.
>>
>> Which is why you are a moron.
>
>Ah, you are still in denial.  

We tell Ah that all the time he just denies it.

>Guess that must be a river in Egypt, k00k.

Wow, such an original falme. You are just a font of material stolen
from the local grade school.

>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> <notes whole "great movie" reference flew over kookoo's nest>
>>>
>>>Now you believe movies are real life.  Very good.  Please check yourself 
>>>in.
>>
>> So you think using a metaphorical situation in a movie as a
>> referential in a usenet post makes it possible for you to determine
>> that someone believes movies to be real?
>
>LOL, try to keep up.

Why didn't you just say "Huh?", moron? 

>
>
>>
>> My gawd, he's as stupid as Stoopid.
>>
>> <Notes: Duhryle still ain't got the reference>
>
>Junior, I ignore mostly what you post.  To do otherwise would be k00kish and 
>you have that cornered already.

Translation:
"Jes Trollin Guv"

You would have looked less foolish had you just wrote "Huh?"


>>>Then you deny that you are a k00k.  Of course, the first sign of a real 
>>>k00k
>>>is their denial.
>>>
>>
>> Where did I deny or agree with anything, Duhryl?
>>
>> BTW, Duh, it's the delusions that give the kooks away first.
>
>Delusion would be to believe that I will surrender.

No, that would be that I want you to surrender. You are to be toyed
with, abused and left laying about until some new denizen of AUK
decides to play "slap the DUH into Duhryle".

>  USdotSplat knows that will NEVER happen. 

Reference a dear hierarchy to support your own delusions.

> Now, when you are k00king at me you are out of 
>circulation for others.  So let's keep this going.  It's entertaining.
>

You are either too stupid to see how over matched you are in every
usenet discussion with every usenet poster you engage or you are a
masochist. Since you believe yourself to be entertained by being made
a fool by so many people I will have to go with the latter.


>>>Just stated fact, twinkie breath.
>>
>> "IT'S A KORNSPIRACY! I FINGERED IT OUT!"
>> You mean that "fact"
>> Please see comment about delusions above, Duh.
>
>REmember, you are the one claiming that I am claiming a conspiracy.  Sounds 
>like you are quite delusional and k00kish to me.
>

Duh, you do know what the word "conspiracy" means, right? 

>
>
>>
>>
>>>Of course, databasix has more than it's fair share of k00ks running around 
>>>on it.
>>
>> "Databasix is the EVUL EMPIRE, I FEAR IT"
>
>LOL, in the grand scale of Empires on the Usenets, Databasix is more akin to 
>a bunch of cub scouts.
>

Which makes your little hobby server, the Brownies.

>
>
>>
>>>But a conspiracy?  Only your
>>>conspiracy theory is a conspiracy in itself and quite k00kish at that.
>>
>> And I quote:
>> "It appears that we found the link between these two."
>> Shall *we* look at that one sentence, Duh?
>> 1. Use of the word *we* to indicate that there is more than one person
>> *investigating*.
>> 2. "the link" which means you were looking for a Kornspiracy.
>> 3. "these two" and there it is, the Kornspirators.
>
>Actually, there is a link.  Without Kevin there would be no Databasix for 
>Gary to play with.

And just what link would that be, DUH? Cmon make your case that there
is a *link*. 

<taps foot>



>> Anything else you need explained about what you write, I am here to
>> help, Duh.
>

<Duh, failing to note the direct responses typed already>
>Try typing and staying focused.

Do you do any other stupid, semi-coherent, marginally human tricks,
Duh?

>
>
>>
>>>But, of course, you will never admit to being a k00k. But a k00k would 
>>>never
>>>admit to being a k00k.  It's quite a circle, there, Sigmund
>>
>> "It is my delusion and I am going to keep beating it until everyone
>> else agrees with my delusion"
>>
>> You are a moron.
>

<Duh, after the amazing feat of reading, retypes previous statement,
then proves the point>
>Is that your new catch phrase?  Guess you ran out of things to say.  Typical 
>of a k00k.

This boy may be the equal of Bullis.