Article View: us.forsale.computers
Article #1002Re: BEWARE! Re:SIMMS4/8/16/32MB EDO$39/$71/$138/$309
From: Steven Kan
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 00:00
Date: Fri, 31 May 1996 00:00
43 lines
3682 bytes
3682 bytes
It may be illegal or contrary to his agreements with the CC companies, but as a
classical economist, I don't think a cash discount/credit surcharge (they're
fundamentally the exact same thing) is a bad idea at all.
Since the CC companies charge the merchants, they should be free to pass that
cost along to the consumers who pay with cards. On the flip side, those
consumers who pay with cash should be able to reap the benefits of the reduced
transaction cost.
If a consumer and merchant are not able to freely bargain and arrange the terms
of their transaction, then *every* time you pay cash for an item, you're
subsidizing those pay with cards. Remember, no one is forcing you to transact
with a particular firm. If you don't like credit surcharges, go to another
merchant. If you're paying cash, seek out the ones that give a discount.
As a crude analogy, how would y'all like it if they made it illegal to charge
different prices for different grades of gas? Gas stations would charge a single
price higher than what they're currently charging for regular, but lower than
what they're currently charging for premium. All of us who drive regular cars
would be subsidizing those who drive picky cars. Same thing with credit cards.
If this particular merchant is under an existing agreement with a CC company,
then of course he is legally and ethically bound to honor that agreement. But it
sounds like a bad agreement. All you merchants out there should band together
and stomp these agreements out. If this is illegal, then we should change the
law.
Just my $0.08 (inflation adjusted)
--
______
A rich man who hailed from Seattle #```````
Wrote Win95 to do battle, # ```````
But Mac users pity # ```````
The masses not witty # ```````
Enough to know Wintel's for cattle. #. ```````
~ ~ . \_@_/ ```````
^_@ o . V ```````
`-' - \_@_ ~ . ######
Steven "Rocket Man" Kan V \ ~ . ######
stevenk@leland.stanford.edu ~ . #H2O##
http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~stevenk ~ .#POLO#
"Never refuse a breath mint." ~ ~ ~ ~ ######
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<31AFAEBD.607B@leland.stanford.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<4ohlrb$ple@news1.radix.net> <4ol1mc$l6e@shore4.intercom.net> <4ol24r$l6e@shore4.intercom.net> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960530220952.19848D-100000@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10cf22,7bf8150a364b5259 X-Google-Attributes: gid10cf22,public X-Google-Thread: fd959,7bf8150a364b5259 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd959,public X-Google-Thread: 11561b,7bf8150a364b5259 X-Google-Attributes: gid11561b,public X-Google-Thread: 1067c3,7bf8150a364b5259 X-Google-Attributes: gid1067c3,public From: Steven Kan <stevenk@leland.stanford.edu> Subject: Re: BEWARE! Re:SIMMS4/8/16/32MB EDO$39/$71/$138/$309 Date: 1996/05/31 Message-ID: <31AFAEBD.607B@leland.stanford.edu> X-Deja-AN: 157840706 references: <4ohlrb$ple@news1.radix.net> <4ol1mc$l6e@shore4.intercom.net> <4ol24r$l6e@shore4.intercom.net> <Pine.SOL.3.91.960530220952.19848D-100000@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Stanford GSB mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: stevenk@leland.stanford.edu newsgroups: us.forsale.computers,misc.forsale.computers.memory,misc.forsale.computers.pc-specific.misc,dc.forsale.computers x-mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; PPC)