🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <89Mar13.102317est.9395@ois.db.toronto.edu> jdd@db.toronto.edu ("John D. DiMarco") writes:
>In any case, the University is a victim of underfunding, not a cause. Striking
>against the University doesn't seem to be a good way to tackle problems
>whose root causes are underfunding.

I have heard this argument many times.  The University of Toronto IS
underfunded.  I think that we all agree.  It is not nearly as poorly
funded, however, as they would like you to believe.  In January, it
was announced that UofT had a 2.2 million dollar budgetary surplus.
That isn't a lot of money, I realize, but it would certainly be
preferable to spend that money on, say, education than administration.
This is the key problem.  The university has an enormous budget,
a budget which could easily be used to hire more faculty and more
TAs, a budget which could easily be used to further the cause of
education on this campus.  Far too small a fraction of it actually
winds up being used for that, though.  Underfunding is an issue,
but budget allocation is perhaps a more serious issue.  We would
all be just a little bit better off if President Connell had not
spent so very much money on redecorating his office.


-- 
 Kevin Dooley         UUCP - {uunet,pyramid}!utai!helios.physics!dooley
 Physics Dept.        BITNET - dooley@utorphys
 U. of Toronto        INTERNET - dooley@helios.physics.utoronto.ca