Article View: utah.general
Article #4Re: ALERT! SB147 - "The Death of Affordable ISDN in Utah?"
From: Dave Andersen
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 07:55
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 07:55
57 lines
3397 bytes
3397 bytes
newhere-in-time (enid@heavan.org) wrote:
: Let's face it...ISDN is dead as it is. With a max 128kbps throughput it's
: just a bandaid until we get to the cable modem (600kbps, 4mps, 10mps).
Yeah, but most of us have about as much faith in cable modems coming
along soon and providing a really god measure of EFFECTIVE bandwidth as
we do about having affordable ISDN. ;)
The fact of the matter is that ISDN is a very plausible technology.
It's possible for US West to impliment it at reasonable cost, make a
decent profit off of those of us who are willing to pay for it, and not
absolutely gouge the consumers.
: Let-em have it. They don't even have a clue what it is to begin with. Even
: if ISDN was affordable if you talk to any US West insider they'll tell you
: that over half of the CO's are not capable of supporting it. By the time all
: the CO's are upgraded the cable modem will be the new thing and will totaly
: bypass ISDN.
If we were in nevada, I'd ask you to wager on that one. :) I'd rather
bet on a technology I know can be implimented _right now_ than one
that's still in pre-beta testing. If/when cable modems come along -- and
I'm not disputing that using coax has much more promise than our happy
twisted pair bandlimited phone lines -- we'll jump to them too.
: I don't know of very many providers that are willing to put up the cost to
: even support it to begin with. The equipment is still unreasonably expensive
: where a 10mps cable modem will come out on the market for about $200 even and
: it will do your voice, data, vidtel, cable, etc.
We'd love to support it. As a matter of the initial equipment outlay,
all of our terminal servers are ISDN-ready. Now. Not tomorrow. Today.
I need to buy the interface board for them, and that's it. You might ask
why I haven't already done so? Because at our ratio of 10 users per
modem, if I have to *pay* US West $180 per month per ISDN line.. well,
you can figure it out. That's $18 off the top for providing ISDN
service.
Most providers in Utah charge between $15 and $25 per month for
individual access. When your phone line charges are between $15 and $18
per user, we'd need to charge exorbitant fees to provide ISDN services.
Add that on top of the $180 our customers would pay for the line in their
home, and it's ridiculous -- who wants to pay $220+ just to have ISDN
when you could get a frame-relay 56k connection for a bit more and have
full time access?
: just 2 cents worth.
My $184/month worth. :)
-Dave Andersen
--
angio@aros.net Complete virtual hosting and business-oriented
system administration Internet services. (WWW, FTP, email)
http://www.aros.net/ http://www.aros.net/about/virtual/
(PGP Available) "She totally confused all the passing piranhas"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4fuou8$cvc@news.aros.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fluffy.aros.net!angioReferences:
<4fm5g7$7ep@xmission.xmission.com> <4fub69$7mf@vodka.intele.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!fluffy.aros.net!angio From: angio@fluffy.aros.net (Dave Andersen) Newsgroups: utah.general,comp.dcom.isdn Subject: Re: ALERT! SB147 - "The Death of Affordable ISDN in Utah?" Followup-To: utah.general,comp.dcom.isdn Date: 15 Feb 1996 07:55:52 GMT Organization: ArosNet Inc. Message-ID: <4fuou8$cvc@news.aros.net> References: <4fm5g7$7ep@xmission.xmission.com> <4fub69$7mf@vodka.intele.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: fluffy.aros.net X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]