🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <BtpD25.44u@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>, shallit@graceland.uwaterloo.ca (Jeffrey Shallit) writes:
> He had been invited to speak to the Carleton University history department
> in 1989, but that invitation was cancelled when they found out who
> he really was.  Similarly, a talk before the Royal Military Institute 
> in Toronto was cancelled when they found out his real message.
> According to the Globe & Mail (March 8, 1989), "Col. Hardie said
> the institute was unaware of Mr. Irving's controversial [sic] views."

  We can't let people with "controversial views" speak to a forum, can we?
  Instead of attempting to silence those academics with these views, why
  not show the errors in their conclusions via academic means?  Surely
  that's the best way to discredit academic liars.

  When Rushton's results got press time, nobody bothered to look at his
  method.  Later, when his method came to light, everybody laughed.
  Similarly, with the recent gender-difference brain-size study.  

                                                               Herb...