Thread View: uw.wordperfect.users
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Mayer Goldberg
Sun, 05 Mar 2000 00:00
can an unopened box of wpo2000 mess up my system??? :)
Author: Mayer Goldberg
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2000 00:00
53 lines
3551 bytes
3551 bytes
Dear WP users: I just ordered a copy of WPO2000 from Corel. It hasn't arrived yet and until I started reading this newsgroup I was really excited about returning to WP. I was a religious 5.1DOS and 6.0aDOS users and slowly drifted away, using TeX, flirting with Frame, etc. Finally, after checking the reviews and drooling at the prospects of working with XML (other word processors that use XML are terribly expensive!) I ordered WPO2000. Then I subscribed to the wordperfect-related newsgroups to catch up on all the fun I've been mising, so that when the package arrives I'll be prepared ... What I wasn't prepared for was these 700+ messages: WP9 seems so frighteningly unreliable that I'm scared to install it. I'm literally considering leaving the box in the corner of the room and going back to appease LaTeX ... I'm running Windows 95 US, on a 166MHz Pentium notebook with 48M RAM. WP Customer Service told me that this is more than enough to run WP9. Now I read that people with 600 MHz machines and 256M RAM are suffering from speed problems while opening WP documents ... I don't really know what to think. WP5.1DOS was very reliable. I knew of several bugs, but it was otherwise very reliable and hardly ever crashed. Of course, back in the "good old days" (shudder!) of DOS, programs didn't mess up the operating system, mess up other programs, etc, and what they did mess up was trivial to fix. - Can I expect a copy of WPO2000 ordered last week, directly from Corel, to have all the necessary service packs?? How do I identify just what service packs are needed? - Is WP9 safe to install?? I'm serious -- I'm not going to use a word processor that requires me to rename 85 files by hand, in order to install a service pack needed before I can install another service pack needed before I can print "Goodby World!". - I own and use Adobe Acrobat, and I use PDF as my primary output medium. What can I expect from WP9?? Should I use Adobe's Acrobat to generate PDF or should I use WP9's PDFWrite-like tool? What will happen to hyperlinks in a WP9 document under Adobe's distiller?? - While reading reviews of WP9, I was somewhat happy to read of "WP's stability/bugs/reliability problems finally being put under contol" -- I say "somewhat" because having remained with WP5.1DOS, I was unaware they had any major reliability problems. I thought technical support for WP5.1 was astonishingly good. Now I read these newsgroups and sudder. What happened! - Are there any major issues I should be aware of BEFORE I dare install WPO?? Very nervous, and not so excited anymore, Mayer
Re: can an unopened box of wpo2000 mess up my system??? :)
Author: Ming The Merciless
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00
66 lines
3697 bytes
3697 bytes
Ming bought WPO2000 Standard, installed it on Ming's Gateway Astro. Runs along with nary a problem. ciao, Ming gmayer@cs.bgu.ac.il (Mayer Goldberg) wrote in <r1Bw4.470$G15.14114@iad-read.news.verio.net>: >Dear WP users: > >I just ordered a copy of WPO2000 from Corel. It hasn't arrived yet and >until I started reading this newsgroup I was really excited about >returning to WP. I was a religious 5.1DOS and 6.0aDOS users and slowly >drifted away, using TeX, flirting with Frame, etc. Finally, after >checking the reviews and drooling at the prospects of working with XML >(other word processors that use XML are terribly expensive!) I ordered >WPO2000. > >Then I subscribed to the wordperfect-related newsgroups to catch up on >all the fun I've been mising, so that when the package arrives I'll be >prepared ... What I wasn't prepared for was these 700+ messages: WP9 >seems so frighteningly unreliable that I'm scared to install it. I'm >literally considering leaving the box in the corner of the room and >going back to appease LaTeX ... > >I'm running Windows 95 US, on a 166MHz Pentium notebook with 48M RAM. WP >Customer Service told me that this is more than enough to run WP9. Now I >read that people with 600 MHz machines and 256M RAM are suffering from >speed problems while opening WP documents ... > >I don't really know what to think. WP5.1DOS was very reliable. I knew of >several bugs, but it was otherwise very reliable and hardly ever >crashed. Of course, back in the "good old days" (shudder!) of DOS, >programs didn't mess up the operating system, mess up other programs, >etc, and what they did mess up was trivial to fix. > >- Can I expect a copy of WPO2000 ordered last week, directly from Corel, >to have all the necessary service packs?? How do I identify just what >service packs are needed? > >- Is WP9 safe to install?? I'm serious -- I'm not going to use a word >processor that requires me to rename 85 files by hand, in order to >install a service pack needed before I can install another service pack >needed before I can print "Goodby World!". > >- I own and use Adobe Acrobat, and I use PDF as my primary output >medium. What can I expect from WP9?? Should I use Adobe's Acrobat to >generate PDF or should I use WP9's PDFWrite-like tool? What will happen >to hyperlinks in a WP9 document under Adobe's distiller?? > >- While reading reviews of WP9, I was somewhat happy to read of "WP's >stability/bugs/reliability problems finally being put under contol" -- I >say "somewhat" because having remained with WP5.1DOS, I was unaware they >had any major reliability problems. I thought technical support for >WP5.1 was astonishingly good. Now I read these newsgroups and sudder. >What happened! > >- Are there any major issues I should be aware of BEFORE I dare install >WPO?? > >Very nervous, and not so excited anymore, > >Mayer >
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads