🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan12.010953.28946@mixcom.com> daniel.offutt <daniel.offutt@mixcom.mixcom.com> writes:
>In <1iplreINNl0h@uwm.edu> dermer@convex.csd.uwm.edu (Marshall Dermer) writes:
>
>

>
>The parochial schools produce better educated children than do the
>public schools -- generally without resorting to expensive schemes like
>paying children for learning.  Moreover, they do so at a lower cost per
>student.  In other words, the parochial schools provide better education
>for less money.

 No doubt!!  The parochial schools teach the children who have parents who
 are most interested in education.  With better social conditions at home to
 promote learning, there are simply better students at private schools.
 Under a school choice system, the best schools will skim off the best
 child/parents.  These schools, of course, will be able to charge more too.
 Compare the tuition in the lower grades at the University School (~$5000)
 with those of another private school that does not have such a positive
 track record . . . The Woodland's School (~$2,500).

>Dan Offutt
>-- 
>Dan Offutt
>

  Marshall