🚀 go-pugleaf

Dave Rasmussen <dave@opus.csd.uwm.edu> wrote in article
<5f9iso$2eg@uwm.edu>...
> From article <5f8b46$ull@uwm.edu>, by yaxman@alpha2.csd.uwm.edu (Michael
T Diedrick):
> > Clinton S. Gallagher (clinton@execpc.com) wrote:
> > : Enough said.
> > : >                          Improving Undergraduate Writing
> > : > 
> > : >          Would you submit a PORTION of one of your essays to our
writing
> > : > 	 project?
> > 
> > Actually, he's doing something to better writing at UWM.
> > 
> > Or am I missing your point?  (Is there a point?)
> 
> My read is that he's saying that this is another case of professors
> making students do their own work for them, which he might compare to
> to the idea of  grad student research where some unscrupulous
> professor would take credit for work they might not have been involved
> in.  It's a cheap shot and especially directed at a writing program
> like this where there's no basis for it.
> 

Cheap Shot?

Such a thing could never happen here in Milwaukee because our
university system is comprised of people of value and substance
whose moral character would never allow them to be involved in
any unscrupulous activity.

Obviously there is nothing humble about my opinion as it has been 
derived from direct experience on multiple occassions at great 
expense to my personal economic welfare. Therefore it is sound to say
that there is nothing cheap about the truth as it is always acquired at 
great expense. The question being "whose"?

Anti-climactic illustration:

One need ask but one simple question that David Rasmussen nor 
anyone else could answer affirmatively. That question being, "Since this 
milw.general news group has been operating - some two years or so - has 
even one of the several professors ever posted the results of their
benevolent
activities to this news group after having begged for ideas and
intellectual 
property that they did indeed exploit"?