Article View: va.general
Article #1063Re: Phone-spam zappers?
From: Chunga
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 02:49
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 02:49
53 lines
3471 bytes
3471 bytes
There is a slightly more low-tech approach. I have found that going to www.the-dma.org and filling out the "do not call" form works really well. I have only had a handful of calls since I did this. With the few calls, a curt "take me off your fucking list!" works pretty well. PS - to all of you who would defend these direct marketing assholes, and say they need to earn a living...I say eff you. "Beartooth" <karhunhammas@Lserv.com> wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.43.0203111057530.874-100000@saltmine.radix.net... > > I don't know if there's a generic term for these > things yet. The one I noticed was in a Radio Shack, but I > presume there must be competitors. I'm wondering first > whether they're a good thing, then whether RS's is a good > one at a good price (fifty bucks). > > According to the clerk, the gizmo detects the > phone-dialing machine, and sends it a message saying : > "This phone has been disconnected. Delete the number from > your list." He also said something to the effect that it was > compatible with existing answering machines. > > Upon being asked, he said the detection worked off > the delay between the time the machine connects to you and > the time it hands off the connection to a human -- or, I > suppose, to a phone-spam-machine that plays a recording ... > > I've got a sneakin' hunch this is going to be like > Call Intercept : some use for a while. Our trashcall volume > went way down with that -- and then up went the rate for > trashcalls that give a number, instead of just > "unavailable," or whatever your caller-ID machine shows. > > I also wonder how much risk there is of false > positives (the zapper killing someone it shouldn't) or > unanticipated interactions with either of my answering > machines (one turned off as to answering, but there on the > line) -- or any other home hardware : DSL filters, > splitters, answering-machine-shutter-uppers, surge > protectors, ..... > > Any experience/advice? > > -- > RR 'Beartooth' Neuswanger <karhunhammas (at) lserv.com> > There is no curse in Entish, Elvish, nor the tongues of Men > dire enough for the least of spammers. So we do what we can. > Send spam to spamrecycle@chooseyourmail.com > see http://www.cauce.org/ > > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a6jqc6$26d$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed0.news.atl.earthlink.net!news.atl.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.GSO.4.43.0203111057530.874-100000@saltmine.radix.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108b95,353f316d0e4f7eef X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,353f316d0e4f7eef X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: fb785,353f316d0e4f7eef X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-11 18:50:08 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed0.news.atl.earthlink.net!news.atl.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail From: "Chunga" <nospam@noname.net> Newsgroups: va.general,dc.general,md.general Subject: Re: Phone-spam zappers? Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 21:49:44 -0500 Organization: MindSpring Enterprises Lines: 55 Message-ID: <a6jqc6$26d$1@nntp9.atl.mindspring.net> References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0203111057530.874-100000@saltmine.radix.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 42.95.66.aa X-Server-Date: 12 Mar 2002 02:49:42 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000