Article View: va.general
Article #113Re: Virginia's Internet Law Challenged
From: Keith A. Glass
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 00:00
53 lines
3246 bytes
3246 bytes
On 8 Oct 1999 13:46:29 GMT, lraszewski@loyola.edu (L. Ross Raszewski) wrote: >On Fri, 08 Oct 1999 12:28:25 GMT, Keith A. Glass <salgak@erols.com> wrote: >>That is not my problem: that's theirs. And it's NOT the Government's >>problem to solve. . . >It would be ideal if they didn't have to, but if the parents aren't going >to be responsible, basic humanity demands that someone else look out for >the children. Would you have the children of irresponsible parents >be puniashed for their parents' irresponsibility? How, exactly, are children being "punished" by unsupervised, unlimited net access ??? And how does it differ from being allowed unsupervised, unlimited access to a library ??? Basic Humanity requires ME to look out for MY children and YOU to look out for YOUR children. It does NOT require a third party to look out for EVERYONE's children, especially without consulting the parents first. . . >>Which really means, they shouldn't have bothered to become parents in >>the first place, but then I've always been in favor of the basic >>policy of "Stupid People Shouldn't Breed". . . where by "Stupid", I >>mean that they aren't up to the responsibilities of the job . . >I'd just as soon that they didn't, but is it the government's place to >enforce that instead? Frankly, I don't care. It's not the government's business there, either. But dealing with Stupidity is not the government's business... >>And why are such children disadvantaged by unsupervised Net access ?? >I'm not sure that they are, but it's not my field of research. They may well >be; I don't know. In the general case, however, when it is determined that >something is harmful to children, I support the government's regulation of >it. Fine. Ban sugared cereals, cartoon-toy tie ins, etc. And enjoy the world that you and Big Brother will make together. Myself, I'll be teaching MY kids individual and personal responsibility, as free citizens of a free nation. . . . -- Keith A. Glass, Techno-JOAT at Large SysAdmin / Network Engineer / Systems Engineer / Assimilated by the Borg Saved by the code of the Penguin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<37fe02e8.925570@news.erols.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<mg6L3.108$yM2.2949200@dca1-nnrp1.news.digex.net> <19991007160844.06103.00000088@ng-cf1.aol.com> <37fd0a5d.193930640@news.erols.com> <slrn7vqt6l.3vvnner.lraszewski@prraszew.loyola.edu> <37fde271.249255459@news.erols.com> <slrn7vrtdi.3vvnner.lraszewski@prraszew.loyola.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a9ce,273dc33518dc8cb1 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a9ce,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,273dc33518dc8cb1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,273dc33518dc8cb1 X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: fb785,273dc33518dc8cb1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public From: salgak@erols.com (Keith A. Glass) Subject: Re: Virginia's Internet Law Challenged Date: 1999/10/08 Message-ID: <37fe02e8.925570@news.erols.com> X-Deja-AN: 534341594 References: <mg6L3.108$yM2.2949200@dca1-nnrp1.news.digex.net> <19991007160844.06103.00000088@ng-cf1.aol.com> <37fd0a5d.193930640@news.erols.com> <slrn7vqt6l.3vvnner.lraszewski@prraszew.loyola.edu> <37fde271.249255459@news.erols.com> <slrn7vrtdi.3vvnner.lraszewski@prraszew.loyola.edu> X-Complaints-To: abuse@rcn.com X-Trace: CfbSCvwHfNAOPYsZli3vTOAa8MAHkM0hTXLyWyFp3Iw= Organization: PACEL Corp., Manassas, VA, USA NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Oct 1999 14:45:49 GMT Newsgroups: va.general,dc.general,md.general,balt.general