Article View: va.general
Article #247Re: Info on LoJack
From: klaatu
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 00:00
174 lines
7255 bytes
7255 bytes
Mark wrote: > = > "Robert E. Klimkiewicz, Jr." <robertk@clark.net> wrote: > = > >Any information on this device/system would be greatly appreciated. > = > >Thanks. > >Robert > = > According to a police officer speaking at a car theft seminar I > attended a couple of years ago, virtually none of the police > departments in this area come equipped with the equipment to track it. > = > It's a great idea on paper, but in this area at least, it's virtually > useless. More disinformation from Joe the Troll, posting as mark@worldcom.com. It's absolutely certain that all police agencies in every major metropolitan area have LoJack tracking capability. Try looking at any of these pages http://venture.media-ware.com/ncl/lojack.htm for starters, or better yet, why not try an altavista search. Here's one for you: http://altavista.digital.com/cgi-bin/query?pg=3Dq&what=3Dweb&fmt=3D.&q=3D= LoJack It should also be noted that the LoJack system does not require police assistance within the Washignton DC Greater Metro area, since the LoJack is a _satellite-assisted_ system within the East Coast regions. > = > = > Based in Dedham, Mass., the LoJack Corporation markets a propriet= ary satellite > supported system to track, locate and recover stolen motor vehicl= es. The problem of > auto theft is at epidemic proportions with annual domestic losses= estimated at $8 > billion. With the cooperation of various state law enforcement ag= encies, LoJack has > expanded its auto tracking services to 12 states. It presently se= rvices a "corridor" > covering the most densely populated areas of the East Coast. Jose= ph F. Abely, > President. (617-326-4700). = = It appears that Joe the Troll has a vested interest in leading people to believe that this 94%-effective vehicle-recovery system is useless in this area. Steal many cars lately, "Joe"? =46rom http://www.autobytel.com/wamr/atd.html - > = > Vehicle Recovery Devices > = > Vehicle recovery devices are the "glamour" anti-theft devices of the =D4= 90s. Products like LoJack, > which works hand-in-hand with the police department to recover stolen v= ehicles, and a new > device called OnGuard, which uses sophisticated satellite positioning s= oftware to track vehicles > anywhere in the world, are gaining popularity. If you own an extremely = expensive vehicle, these > devices might offer the kind of protection you feel you require. Howeve= r, those with less valuable > cars, might be less likely to want to recover a vehicle after its been = picked over by professional > auto thieves. As one dealer we spoke to said, "If my car's been stolen,= I don't want anyone to find > it." > = > The Low-Down on LoJack > = > LoJack is a small box that is installed in your car and sends transmiss= ions to police tracking > computers. According to LoJack competitors there are numerous drawbacks= to the LoJack system. > First of all, your vehicle is only traced once you report it stolen. Th= is means if a car is stolen at > midnight and you don't report it until 7:00 a.m., the thieves have a se= ven-hour jump on the police. = > = > Another potential drawback is that LoJack relies on police cooperation = to work. Only police cars > that are equipped with the LoJack tracking device (and not all of them = are) can track the stolen > vehicle. Still, LoJack's recovery rates are high--94%--and LoJack refun= ds the cost of the system > if your stolen vehicle isn't found within 24 hours of the theft report.= > = > LoJack's availability is fairly wide-spread, however it only works in t= he area in which it was > purchased. In the U.S., you can find LoJack in Florida, New Jersey, Mic= higan, California, Illinois, > Georgia, Virginia, New York, Washington D.C., Connecticut and Rhode Isl= and. International readers > can find the same technology in the United Kingdom, Greece, Ecuador, Co= lumbia, Czech and > Slovak Republics and Hong Kong, under the names of CarSearch and Tracke= r by LoJack. > = > OnGuard Personal Security and Vehicle Tracking System > = > A new product that plans to go head-to-head with LoJack is the OnGuard = System from ATX > Research, Inc. This Texas-based company uses Global Positioning System = (GPS) satellites to let > distressed drivers call for help or authorities track their stolen cars= =2E OnGuard requires a cellular > phone installed in the vehicle (not a handheld model). The driver must = enter a passcode on the > cellular phone handset when starting the car or the tracker activates a= nd the OnGuard Response > Center begins tracking the vehicle. In addition, a "panic" button lets = users call for emergency help > and authorities know exactly where the driver is located. > = > Although OnGuard is initially being sold in Texas, New Orleans, Chicago= and St. Louis, the very > nature of GPS, a system of satellites originally used by the government= for defense purposes, > makes this a product of national scope. This means if your vehicle was = stolen in Los Angeles and > shipped to Singapore, OnGuard would still be able to track it. Unlike L= oJack which has just a > one-time fee, OnGuard costs around $700 and requires a monthly fee of a= bout $15.00. Note that it's just a matter of time before governments worldwide require the installation of an OnGuard-type system as a prerequisite of licensing for any vehicle. Note that such legislation will be speedily passed, as it will be intensely-backed by the automotive insurance industries as well as police and secret-police agencies. And of course shortly after this becomes a done-thing, rather like airbags, we will shortly see the first few cases where (parallel to airbags killing children) OnGuard-type vehicle-recovery systems will be used to fatally stalk unsuspecting victims. -- = Be kind to your | When the going gets weird the weird turn pro. neighbors even though | http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/ they be transgenic | Now. chock full of uninteresting links. chimerae. |-- Genesis 19:1-13 - Hebrews 13:2 -- = ---- INCOMING! http://www.clark.net/pub/klaatu/incoming.html --------- "Sarah Connor?" All UseNet and BitNet postings are copyrighted.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32878612.6903A4A4@earthops.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<01bbce8d$417c5b00$96078fa8@default> <567pnp$caq@news2.cais.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10a9ce,3353fe77eefb0751 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a9ce,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,3353fe77eefb0751 X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,3353fe77eefb0751 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: fb785,3353fe77eefb0751 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public From: klaatu <root@earthops.org> Subject: Re: Info on LoJack Date: 1996/11/11 Message-ID: <32878612.6903A4A4@earthops.org> X-Deja-AN: 196123058 references: <01bbce8d$417c5b00$96078fa8@default> <567pnp$caq@news2.cais.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 organization: Earth Operations Central, 1486 Harvard Street, #5, NW Washington DC 20056 mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: va.general,dc.general,md.general,balt.general x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (X11; I; Linux 2.0.0 i486)