🚀 go-pugleaf

That is truly scary... so did you find a better jurisdiction?
From the looks of it, you could hardly have failed... 

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 20:41:53 -0400, "John Gilmer"
<gilmer@crosslink.net> wrote:

>> Okay, the "authorities" in Spotsylvania were notified REPEATEDLY that
>> this stupid bitch's dogs were a deadly threat, and they did NOTHING.
>>
>> Now they're all sanctimonious about it.
>
>Tee hee.
>
>That's why I no longer live there.
>
>About 20 years ago (just you give you some prospective on how things are run
>there) about 1/3 of the sheriff's department ended up going to jail.   Turns
>out they are breaking into homes and businesses.
>
>To anyone who paid attention at the time, all the crooked deputies didn't
>end up in jail.  The investigation stopped short.   "They" found a guy who
>"took a fall" and was convicted (and lost his job) over a $5 padlock.   This
>was to convince "the people" that the investigation had run its course.
>
>There were less than honest deputies working there when I left and some of
>them had helped bring in the present sheriff (the sheriff who saw 1/3 of his
>force go to jail was RE-ELECTED once).
>
>Their SOP when a citizen complains about criminal act is to find some charge
>on which they can arrect the guy who had the nerve to complain!    One
>example from years ago was a guy who called up because he saw someone
>sneaking about his home.   The guy took his gun with him to check things
>out.   When the "deputy" arrived, he put the pistol in his pocket.   The
>"deputy" arrested him for carrying a concealed weapon.  Basically, if you
>like in Spotsylvania, it's a waste of time to call the "cops."
>
>Eventually they will get too greedy and maybe "this time" the authorities
>will truly clean house but I don't think so.
>
>I believe that corruption has become "institutionalized" in the criminal
>"justice" system there.
>
>