🚀 go-pugleaf

On 8 Feb 1997 05:55:14 GMT, action@jumppoint.com (Jim/Joanne) wrote:

>Time is 9:45pm  February 7th, 1997
>the predicted numbers are: 
>12..19.10..43..15..26..37..14..41..4..40..44..32..5..35
>
>the other 10 numbers are: 
>09..17..11..1..23..8..07..29..24..13..16
>
>joanne






Only 1 number correct, thats not too good.

2-3 numbers would be average for tne numbers selected

Bill

>>Time is 9:45pm  February 7th, 1997
>>the predicted numbers are: 
>>12..19.10..43..15..26..37..14..41..4..40..44..32..5..35
>>
>>the other 10 numbers are: 
>>09..17..11..1..23..8..07..29..24..13..16
>>
>>joanne

>Only 1 number correct, thats not too good.
>
>2-3 numbers would be average for tne numbers selected
>
>Bill

No it's not very good, and there is no excuse for it either. 
Some how I really made some mistakes when entering the 
needed information.  
Because when I re-did the the first sub-set I had 2 numbers 
in the first 5 numbers.  Some where along the line I entered 
in the wrong information.  
I also made the mistake of not looking for any numbers in the 
20's and there where 5 numbers this time around namely the 
20, 21, 25, 23, 26.  
The ony excuse I can make is someone offered me a large sum
of money to play the numbers for them.  And I turned the person
down.  I'm still shaking my head.
Even if I only got 5 numbers right once a month.  thats $3,000.00
plus not bad for a few days work.  
So it's back to the drawing board.  To see what I did wrong.  I 
know it is not the computer program.  
joanne