🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Jul27.142517.1@highd.enet.dec.com>, fisher@highd.enet.dec.com 
writes:
[stuf deleted...]
>I disagree to a point here - if a user logs into the POSIX shell and never
>touches DCL or VMS library functions, this is true, but a VMSNET.POSIX for the
>discussion of VMS Posix, and how to interoperate between VMS and VMS Posix
>(i.e. calling shell from DCL, DCL from shell, file name string scan hints and
>kings, etc) would not be appropriate in the comp.unix heiarchy - in fact many
>comp.unix folks may be offended by the mere presense of VMS'ers asking a bunch
>of questions that are "irrelavent to a real UN*X system."
>
>My vote would be for a VMSNET.POSIX, even if the traffic doesn't warrant it, it
>would announce the category of questions, and may get more specific readership.
> 
>-- 
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Lawrence Fisher                      Realtime Software Specialist
>Fisher@HIGHD.ENET.DEC.COM            Digital Equipment Corporation
>                                     Ridgecrest, CA
>*   This message reflects my own views/opinions, not those of my company    *
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree strongly with Mr. Fisher on this.
-steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Hespelt - Laboratory for Laser Energetics University of Rochester
                250 East River Rd. Rochester, NY  14623
fooz@lle.rochester.edu                                    (716) 275-5280
fooz@max.db1.cc.rochester.edu    _________________\|/_    Fax (716) 275-5960
                                                  /|\