🚀 go-pugleaf

Joel,

In article <1SEP199210172255@mrsvax.mis.arizona.edu>, jms@mrsvax.mis.arizona.edu (Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem) writes:
>Well, as self-interested as I may be on the subject of Digital Review and
>Digital News, I think I'll respond to SCHENKENBERG@Monmouth-ETDL1.Army.MIL,
>murphy@npri6.npri.com, and others. 
>
>Suggesting that one should refuse to read anything in the same format as
>the National Enquirer betrays an astonishing parochialism.  Eliminating
>fee-free publications from your reading list will cause you to be
>ignorant of the nature of the industry you work in, probably more so than
>if you believed every word that Bill Hancock wrote.  You should be able to
>distinguish between fact and fantasy, between press release and media hype,
>and between correct and incorrect technical information. 

	The problem that at least some of us have is that we don't have time to
read all of sources of information.  I have eliminate DR from my list due to
the amount of material that I had to read to get new and useful information.

P.S. - I have a Matco mug for pointing out to DR that VMS does *NOT* run on 
       any of the PDP-11 series.