Article View: vmsnet.internals
Article #355Re: VMS shareable images, what's wrong with them?
From: Paul S. Winalski
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 19:40
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 19:40
16 lines
1398 bytes
1398 bytes
In article <6372@npri6.npri.com>, murphy@npri6.npri.com (David P. Murphy) writes: |> |>it's not even a religious issue --- there's nothing to discuss. |>dec decided to implement shareable images in a certain way, and so they did, |>and that's all there is to it. i certainly wish they had done it differently, |>but there's no chance of changing it now because it would be incompatible. Not true. The image header record has major and minor version IDs precisely so that the image format can be changed in an upward-compatible fashion. As long as the Linker and image activator continued to recognize and process old-format images correctly, in principle anything goes as far as the changes that could be made in the new format. --PSW
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct10.194031.14847@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!adserv.enet.dec.com!winalskiReferences:
<Bvo7FC.M01@ithaca.com> <1aubqgINNbhn@gap.caltech.edu> <ld5vdbINN763@news.bbn.com> <6372@npri6.npri.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: vmsnet.internals,comp.os.vms Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!adserv.enet.dec.com!winalski From: winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski) Subject: Re: VMS shareable images, what's wrong with them? Message-ID: <1992Oct10.194031.14847@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com> Lines: 16 Sender: usenet@nntpd2.cxo.dec.com (USENET News System) Reply-To: winalski@adserv.enet.dec.com (Paul S. Winalski) Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation, Nashua NH References: <Bvo7FC.M01@ithaca.com> <1aubqgINNbhn@gap.caltech.edu> <ld5vdbINN763@news.bbn.com> <6372@npri6.npri.com> Date: Sat, 10 Oct 1992 19:40:31 GMT