Thread View: vmsnet.mail.misc
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Aaron Leonard
Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:04
Mail-11 => SMTP gatewaying per RFC-1405
Author: Aaron Leonard
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:04
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 18:04
35 lines
1845 bytes
1845 bytes
We operate an e-mail gateway that relays mail between Mail-11 (DECnet) and SMTP (among others.) (Our gateway runs PMDF on a VMS platorm.) Let's say that our gateway has a DECnet nodename of GATE and an Internet domain name of Gate.Arizona.EDU. When a mail message is sent via Mail-11 thru our gateway to an SMTP destination, we rewrite its From: address as USER%Host.DECnet@Gate.Arizona.EDU. For example, if Mail-11 user BUGS::LEONARD uses our gateway to send mail to SMTP user <jones@frobbitz.com>, he'll address his message to GATE::IN%"jones@frobbitz.com" The SMTP user will receive this message with a From: address of LEONARD%BUGS.DECnet@Gate.Arizona.EDU This approach works well. Today RFC-1405, "Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)" was published. In section A3.2, "Mail-11 mapped in RFC822", this RFC recommends that Mail-11 => SMTP gatewayed addresses be rewritten as "Mail-11-address"@gateway-address So that, in my example above, jones@frobbitz.com would have received the message from "BUGS::LEONARD"@Gate.Arizona.EDU Would anyone care to comment on the desireability, or lack thereof, of changing our rewrite rule to comply with this aspect of RFC-1405? Aaron Aaron Leonard (AL104), <Leonard@Arizona.EDU> University of Arizona Network Operations, Tucson AZ 85721
Re: Mail-11 => SMTP gatewaying per RFC-1405
Author: Matt Madison
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:04
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 20:04
22 lines
1433 bytes
1433 bytes
In article <1993Jan21.110451.4275@arizona.edu>, leonard@telcom.arizona.edu (Aaron Leonard) writes: >Today RFC-1405, "Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 >(DECnet mail)" was published. In section A3.2, "Mail-11 mapped in >RFC822", this RFC recommends that Mail-11 => SMTP gatewayed >addresses be rewritten as > "Mail-11-address"@gateway-address > >So that, in my example above, jones@frobbitz.com would have received >the message from > "BUGS::LEONARD"@Gate.Arizona.EDU > >Would anyone care to comment on the desireability, or lack thereof, >of changing our rewrite rule to comply with this aspect of RFC-1405? The biggest reason NOT to do this is because most UNIX systems won't be able to deal with that form of address. The quotes often get stripped, leading to syntactically-invalid addresses. -Matt -- Matthew Madison | madison@tgv.com | +1 408 427 4366 TGV, Inc. | 603 Mission Street | Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USA
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads