RE: The case problem

Article View: vmsnet.mail.mx

Article #338

#338

From: Per Hogstedt
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 16:29

5 lines
593 bytes

While we're at it; would it be violating some RFC if /NOCASE could be
enabled on a per-list basis vs on a per-user basis? That is, adding a /NOCASE
qualifier to the CREATE command?

/Per (one minute later)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <00965482.6A46B9A0.25085@plab.se>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!mx-list

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!mx-list
From: Per Hogstedt <hogstedt@plab.se>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: The case problem
Message-ID: <00965482.6A46B9A0.25085@plab.se>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 17:29:20 +0100
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List
Lines: 5