Article View: vmsnet.mail.mx
Article #357Re: Something is stripping blanks....
From: Eric Thomas
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 10:23
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1993 10:23
20 lines
1413 bytes
1413 bytes
In article <1992Dec29.183421.22777@news.arc.nasa.gov>, madison@tgv.com (Matt Madison) writes: > Yes, MX trims trailing blanks. It does this for two reasons. > > 1. You have to trim blanks on messages coming in from BITNET. > The typical message format there is fixed-length 80-byte records. > > 2. It saves space on disk. > > The BITNET problem should probably be handled by doing the blank-trimming in > the MX-Jnet interface ONLY. And only if the message came in in PUNCH format. Within a few months most of BITNET (in terms of amount of generated messages, rather than amount of machines) should be running NETDATA-capable mailers, and there you don't want to strip spaces. I realize that the JNET interface probably isn't told what format the file came in, but if the blank line separating the header from the body is exactly 80 bytes long you can be fairly sure the message was sent in PUNCH format. Eric
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan1.102312.1@sejnet.sunet.se>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!sejnet.sunet.se!ericReferences:
<1992Dec24.082048.1098@dmc.com> <1992Dec29.183421.22777@news.arc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!sejnet.sunet.se!eric From: eric@sejnet.sunet.se (Eric Thomas) Subject: Re: Something is stripping blanks.... Message-ID: <1993Jan1.102312.1@sejnet.sunet.se> Lines: 20 Sender: news@sunic.sunet.se Reply-To: ERIC@SEARN.SUNET.SE Organization: SUNET, Stockholm, Sweden References: <1992Dec24.082048.1098@dmc.com> <1992Dec29.183421.22777@news.arc.nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 10:23:12 GMT