RE: Q: MX over DEC UCX... (ignore,pls)

Article View: vmsnet.mail.mx

Article #362

#362

From: Anthony J. Rzepela
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 23:00

18 lines
1324 bytes

In a recent posting, I posed a question that I could have answered
myself with the correct version of the MX docs.  I was reading
from MX 2.3 hardcopy, and had my question answered when I found
some online 3.0.

It dealt with whose SMTP (MX's or the TCP/IP package's) gets to run, and
whether MX could function just as a VMS Mail interface, using the
TCP/IP package's components.

Since it took less time to FTP MX3.1C, install and run it, than to
diagnose other, unrelated problems with my SMTP component of UCX 2.0,
(not to mention coming up with substitutes for .sig file capability,
correct aliasing, etc. all of which I came to know and love under
MX3.0 on CMU-Tek) I now have MX3.1C going, and am a happy camper once again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anthony Rzepela    <rzepela@cvi.hahnemann.edu>
                   <rzepela@hal.hahnemann.edu>

Technical Details

Message-ID: <00967199.D86AA0C0.28124@hal.hahnemann.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!mx-list

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!news.service.uci.edu!unogate!mvb.saic.com!mx-list
From: "Anthony J. Rzepela" <rzepela@hal.hahnemann.edu>
Newsgroups: vmsnet.mail.mx
Subject: RE: Q: MX over DEC UCX... (ignore,pls)
Message-ID: <00967199.D86AA0C0.28124@hal.hahnemann.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 18:00:08 EST
Organization: Mx-List<==>Vmsnet.Mail.Mx Gateway
X-Gateway-Source-Info: Mailing List
Lines: 18